Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,413

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Use of Fluorescein Diacetate and Phenosafranine for Determining Viability of Cultured Plant Cells

Widholm, Jack M.·1972·Stain Technology

Abstract

Various stains were tested with suspension cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco), Oryza sativa (rice), Glycine max (soybean), Daucus carota (carrot) and Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). A drop of the culture medium containing each dye was mixed with a drop of cells on a microscope slide and viewed after 5 min. The most suitable dyes tested were fluorescein diacetate for viable cells and phenosafranine for dead cells. These dyes stained specifically whether the cells were from cultures of different ages, of different species or if the cells had been treated in various, often toxic, ways. The viability of the cells was confirmed by observing cyclosis and plasmolysis, and whether the cells could grow further when cultured.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10520297209116483

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,413

Metadata

Authors
Widholm, J. M.
Venue
Stain Technology
Published
1972-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
189-194
ISSN
0038-9153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026311140
Cited by
1,413
References
0
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Fluorescein Diacetate and Phenosafranine for Determining Viability of Cultured Plant Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10520297209116483
The paper
Widholm, J. M. (1972). The Use of Fluorescein Diacetate and Phenosafranine for Determining Viability of Cultured Plant Cells. Stain Technology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520297209116483

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.