The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Reliable and Sensitive Method to Localize Terminal Degeneration and Lysosomes in the Central Nervous System
Abstract
After reconsidering the physicochemical mechanisms involved in the so-called degeneration methods for the demonstration of axons and nerve terminals, the method of Eager was fundamentally modified in order to stabilize the staining process. This resulted in a simple and reliable method which stains degenerating terminals and lysosomes with a high degree of selectivity and sensitivity. Frozen sections 30 to 50 micrometers thick are prepared from material fixed with formaldehyde by cardiac perfusion. The staining procedure consists of 5 steps: 1) alkaline pretreatment (pH 13), 2) silver impregnation, 3) washing, 4) development at pH 5.0-5.5 monitored by an indicator, and 5) washing in acetic acid. Possible faults can be easily detected by their specific effects on the staining results. Primary submicroscopic silver precipitates are localized selectively in the osmiophilic parts of lysosomes and those degenerating presynaptic elements that are surrounded by glial processes. In degenerating axons, precipitates originating from mitochondria can usually be distinguished from terminal degeneration by their different size, shape, or characteristic arrangement. Nonspecific staining is restricted to glial fibrils, erythrocytes, and single cell nuclei. Dark field illumination can be applied routinely and television image analysis can be used for quantitative evaluation because of low background staining.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fluoro-Jade C results in ultra high resolution and contrast labeling of degenerating neurons
Schmued, L. C., Stowers, C. C., Scallet, A. C., & Xu, L. (2005) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.11.054 · Cited by 631
Soares, H., Hicks, R., Smith, D., & McIntosh, T. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-12-08223.1995 · Cited by 379
Grain, B. J., Westerkam, W. D., Harrison, A. H., & Nadler, J. V. (1988) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(88)90276-x · Cited by 301
Blasco‐Ibáñez, J. M., & Freund, T. F. (1995) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00638.x · Cited by 212
Dinocourt, C., Petanjek, Z., Freund, T. F., Ben‐Ari, Y., & Esclapez, M. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10622 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallyas, F., Wolff, J. R., Böttcher, H., & Zaborszky, L.
- Venue
- Stain Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 299-306
- ISSN
- 0038-9153 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148836895
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Reliable and Sensitive Method to Localize Terminal Degeneration and Lysosomes in the Central Nervous System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10520298009067258
- The paper
- Gallyas, F., Wolff, J. R., Böttcher, H., & Zaborszky, L. (1980). A Reliable and Sensitive Method to Localize Terminal Degeneration and Lysosomes in the Central Nervous System. Stain Technology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520298009067258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.