The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to Substance Abuse Treatment in Rural and Urban Communities: Counselor Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study is to compare rural and urban substance abuse counselors' perceptions of barriers to providing effective treatment services. Data were collected from 28 substance abuse counselors in Kentucky during four focus group sessions in 2008. Line-by-line coding and memoing were used by two raters on the transcribed data to isolate findings. The results of this study suggest that, though rural and urban counselors encounter similar constraints that hamper successful treatment outcomes, rural counselors are subject to special circumstances within their communities that present unique challenges to treatment efficacy. Novel contributions, implications, and limitations are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Despite the growing recognition of substance use as a critical public health issue, the response in West Africa has been hampered by several challenges [3, 9]. These include limited access to treatment services, inadequate funding for prevention programs, and a lack of comprehensive data on drug use patterns [17].”
From Prevalence and patterns of substance use in West Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737008003329 · Cited by 10,357
Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide To Qualitative Observation And Analysis
Lofland, J., & , J. (1971) · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) · Cited by 5,625
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437
Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis
Charmaz, K. C., & Belgrave, L. L. (2012) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452218403.n25 · Cited by 2,101
Arora, S., Kalishman, S. G., Dion, D., Som, D., Thornton, K., Bankhurst, A. D., Boyle, J., Harkins, M. S., Moseley, K., Murata, G. H., et al. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0278 · Cited by 288
Appel, P. W., Ellison, A. A., Jansky, H. K., & Oldak, R. (2004) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1081/ada-120029870 · Cited by 220
The Effects of Travel Barriers and Age on the Utilization of Alcoholism Treatment Aftercare
Fortney, J. C., Booth, B. M., Blow, F. C., Bunn, J. Y., & Cook, C. A. L. (1995) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.3109/00952999509002705 · Cited by 174
Distance traveled to outpatient drug treatment and client retention
Beardsley, K. C., Wish, E. D., Fitzelle, D. B., O’Grady, K. E., & Arria, A. M. (2003) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(03)00188-0 · Cited by 172
Counselor emotional exhaustion and turnover intention in therapeutic communities
Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.04.003 · Cited by 164
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Charmaz K., 2001, Analytic Strategies
- Clay R., 2007, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration Newsletter,, 15, 1
- Hutchinson, L. & Blakely, C. (2010). Substance abuse trends in rural areas: A literature review. Rural Healthy People 2010: A companion document to health people 2010 (Vol. 2). College Station, TX: Southwest Rural Health Research Center.
- Pruitt L. R., 2009, Stanford Law & Policy Review,, 20, 259
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2011, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harrington, R. A., Califf, R. M., Balamurugan, A., Brown, N., Benjamin, R. M., Braund, W. E., Hipp, J. S., Konig, M., Sánchez, E., & Maddox, K. E. J. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000753 · Cited by 393
Mack, K. A., Jones, C. M., & Ballesteros, M. F. (2017) · MMWR Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6619a1 · Cited by 265
Barriers and Facilitators to Substance Use Treatment in the Rural South: A Qualitative Study
Browne, T. A., Priester, M. A., Clone, S., Iachini, A. L., DeHART, D. D., & Hock, R. (2015) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12129 · Cited by 219
Urban-rural variation in the socioeconomic determinants of opioid overdose
Pear, V. A., Ponicki, W. R., Gaidus, A. J., Keyes, K. M., Martins, S. S., Fink, D. S., Rivera‐Aguirre, A., Gruenewald, P. J., & Cerdá, M. (2018) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.024 · Cited by 211
Mack, K. A., Jones, C. M., & Ballesteros, M. F. (2017) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.14555 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Pullen, E., & Oser, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pullen, Erin
- Venue
- Substance Use & Misuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 891-901
- ISSN
- 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2491
- PMC
- PMC3995852
- OpenAlex
- W2130517233
- Semantic Scholar
- 119548f23e1fac496185bce652806a0c7879508b
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA021309)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- addiction treatment, barriers to treatment, rural communities, urban communities, addiction counselors, counselor perceptions, urban-rural differences, treatment efficacy, Kentucky
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication Barriers, Cooperative Behavior, Counseling, Female, Financial Support, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Kentucky, Language, Male, Rural Population, Transportation, Urban Population, Focus Groups, Case Management, Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
