The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Operating and Formulation Variables on the Morphology of Spray-Dried Protein Particles
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the shape and morphology of various spray-dried protein powders as a function of spray-drying conditions and protein formulations. A benchtop spray dryer was used to spray dry three model proteins in formulation with a sugar or a surfactant. Physical characterizations of the powder included morphology (scanning electron microscopy), particle size, residual moisture, and X-ray powder diffraction analyses. A significant change in particle shape from irregular (e.g., "donut") to spherical was observed as the outlet temperature of the dryer was decreased. The drying air outlet temperature was shown to depend on various operating parameters and was found to correlate with the drying rate of atomized droplets in the drying chamber. The morphology of spray-dried protein particles was also affected by formulation. In protein:sugar formulations, spray-dried particles exhibited a smooth surface regardless of the protein-to-lactose ratio, whereas roughness was observed when mannitol was present at > 30% of total solids, due to recrystallization. Protein particles containing trehalose at concentrations > 50% were highly agglomerated. The presence of surfactant resulted in noticeably smoother, more spherical particles. The shape and the morphology of spray-dried powders are affected by spray drying conditions and protein formulation. This study provides information useful for development of dry proteins for fine powder (e.g., aerosol) applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Particle formation in spray drying
Vehring, R., Foss, W. R., & Lechuga-Ballesteros, D. (2007) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.04.005 · Cited by 707
Nano spray drying: A novel method for preparing protein nanoparticles for protein therapy
Lee, S. H., Heng, D., Ng, W. K., Chan, H.-K., & Tan, R. B. H. (2011) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.012 · Cited by 405
3D printing: Principles and pharmaceutical applications of selective laser sintering
Awad, A., Fina, F., Goyanes, A., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2020) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119594 · Cited by 371
Protein Inhalation Powders: Spray Drying vs Spray Freeze Drying
Maa, Y.-F., Nguyen, P.-A., Sweeney, T., Shire, S. J., & Hsu, C. C. (1999) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018828425184 · Cited by 356
Self-citationMaury, M., Murphy, K., Kumar, S., Shi, L., & Lee, G. (2005) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.10.002 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Maa, Y.-F., Costantino, H. R., Nguyen, P.-A., & Hsu, C. C.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Development and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-223
- ISSN
- 1083-7450 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-9867
- OpenAlex
- W2123984889
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Operating and Formulation Variables on the Morphology of Spray-Dried Protein Particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10837459709031441
- The paper
- Maa, Y.-F., Costantino, H. R., Nguyen, P.-A., & Hsu, C. C. (1997). The Effect of Operating and Formulation Variables on the Morphology of Spray-Dried Protein Particles. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10837459709031441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.