“Gold standard” data for evaluation and comparison of 3D/2D registration methods
Open accessAbstract
Evaluation and comparison of registration techniques for image-guided surgery is an important problem that has received little attention in the literature. In this paper we address the challenging problem of generating reliable "gold standard" data for use in evaluating the accuracy of 3D/2D registrations. We have devised a cadaveric lumbar spine phantom with fiducial markers and established highly accurate correspondences between 3D CT and MR images and 18 2D X-ray images. The expected target registration errors for target points on the pedicles are less than 0.26 mm for CT-to-X-ray registration and less than 0.42 mm for MR-to-X-ray registration. As such, the "gold standard" data, which has been made publicly available on the Internet (http://lit.fe.uni-lj.si/Downloads/downloads.asp), is useful for evaluation and comparison of 3D/2D image registration methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using target points defined on each pedicle, initial median PDE was 129.47 mm and solution was 0.026 mm.
“To consider a different clinical application scenario such as pedicle screw placement, the PDE was also computed using target points defined on each pedicle (Tomazevic et al 2004), showing initial median PDE of 129.47 mm and the solution of 0.026 mm.”
From Robust 3D–2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation (2013) · cites this paper as Tomazevic et al 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Otake, Y., Wang, A. S., Webster Stayman, J., Uneri, A., Kleinszig, G., Vogt, S., Khanna, A. J., Gokaslan, Z. L., & Siewerdsen, J. H. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8535 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., & Pernuš, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Ljubljana (SI)
- Corresponding author
- Pernuš, Franjo
- Venue
- Computer Aided Surgery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 1092-9088 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0150
- OpenAlex
- W2160468054
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Computer Aided Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Keywords
- registration evaluation, image-guided surgery, fiducial markers, target registration error
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lumbar Vertebrae, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Anatomic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
