Cited by 71Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Significant junctures on the way towards becoming a user of assistive technology in Alzheimer's disease

Lindqvist, Eva, Nygård, Louise, Borell, Lena·2013·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to describe how persons in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) became users of assistive technology (AT), and what the use of AT came to mean to these users and, when relevant, their significant others.Methods Persons with AD were provided with individually chosen AT during a six-month period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the intervention period. The data were analysed with a constant comparative approach.Results On the way towards becoming a user of AT, four junctures were identified, at which significant decisions were made by the participants. These decisions influenced whether to become a user or not and related to how the initial decision was made, how the routines to incorporate the AT were adjusted, whether the participant trusted the AT, and whether the participants felt an increased sense of capacity when using the AT. As users, the participants perceived how time and effort was saved, how worries and stress decreased, and how their sense of safety increased, which enabled them to perform valued activities, e.g. health-promoting and social activities, to a greater extent and in a more relaxed way than before.Conclusions The findings support the view that AT can positively affect the activity performance of people with AD when the potential user can identify difficulties and needs and is motivated and able to make changes to overcome them, given that appropriate human support is available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/11038128.2013.766761

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 71

Authors
Lindqvist, E., Nygård, L., & Borell, L.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindqvist, Eva
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2013-02-11
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
386-396
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W1992265364
Cited by
71
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
  • Swedish Brain Power
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
assistive technology, Alzheimer's disease, early-stage dementia, technology adoption, user experience, trust in technology, significant others, activity performance, human support
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Self-Help Devices, Needs Assessment, Trust, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review