Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Use of amyloid PET across the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease: clinical utility and associated ethical issues

Leuzy, Antoine, Zimmer, Eduardo Rigon, Heurling, Kerstin, Rosa-Neto, Pedro, Gauthier, Serge·2014·Amyloid

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances have made possible the in vivo detection of beta-amyloid (Aβ) pathology using positron emission tomography. While the gold standard for amyloid imaging, carbon-11 labeled Pittsburgh compound B is increasingly being replaced by fluorine-18 labeled radiopharmaceuticals, with three already approved for clinical use by US and European regulatory bodies. Appropriate use criteria proposed by an amyloid imaging taskforce convened by the Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging recommend restricting use of this technology to the evaluation of patients with mild cognitive impairment or atypical dementia syndromes. While use among asymptomatic individuals is currently viewed as inappropriate due prognostic uncertainty, elevated levels of brain Aβ among asymptomatic individuals may represent preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Amyloid imaging is likewise expected to play a role in the design of clinical trials. Though preliminary results suggest amyloid imaging to possess clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, both domains have yet to be assessed systematically. As the field moves toward adoption of a pro-disclosure stance for amyloid imaging findings, it is imperative that a broad range of stakeholders be involved to ensure the appropriateness of emerging policies and protocols.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/13506129.2014.926267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 31

Authors
Leuzy, A., Zimmer, E. R., Heurling, K., Rosa-Neto, P., & Gauthier, S.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging (CA)
Corresponding author
Gauthier, Serge
Venue
Amyloid
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
143-148
ISSN
  • 1350-6129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-2818
OpenAlex
W2105210332
Cited by
31
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Amyloid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#MOP-11-51-31)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
amyloid PET, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta imaging, Pittsburgh compound B, mild cognitive impairment, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, appropriate use criteria, clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, clinical trial design, health policy
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Brain, Carbon Radioisotopes, Dementia, Ethylene Glycols, Fluorine Radioisotopes, Humans, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography, Benzothiazoles, Asymptomatic Diseases, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review