Cited by 86Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Instruments to identify post-natal depression: Which methods have been the most extensively validated, in what setting and in which language?

Hewitt, Catherine E., Gilbody, Simon M., Mann, Rachel, Brealey, Stephen·2010·International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Abstract Objectives. To investigate which methods to identify post-natal depression are the most extensively validated, in what setting and in what language. Methods. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken to retrieve English and non-English language articles available until February 2007. This included searching 16 electronic databases, forward citation searching, personal communication with authors and inspection of reference lists. Results. A total of 60 studies (published in 64 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Four PND specific measures and nine generic depression (and sometimes anxiety) measures were found to have been validated against a diagnostic reference standard in pregnant or post-natal populations. The Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most frequently validated method to identify women with PND. The EPDS has been translated and validated in 20 different languages. The majority of studies were undertaken at ante-natal clinics (n=15), after the birth in post-natal wards (n=12) or during post-natal visits or follow-up clinics (n=16). Conclusions. The EPDS is the most frequently researched method to identify PND and has been translated and validated in multiple different languages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/13651500903198020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 86

Authors
Hewitt, C. E., Gilbody, S. M., Mann, R., & Brealey, S.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Hewitt, Catherine E.
Venue
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Published
2009-12-09
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
72-76
ISSN
  • 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1788
OpenAlex
W2019614733
Cited by
86
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (05/39/06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
screening tool, psychometric validation, language translation, cross-cultural adaptation, pregnant women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review