RETRACTED ARTICLE: Psychometric properties of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised among a sample of non-clinical Iranian women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of a Persian version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (P-FSDS-R) among a sample of healthy Iranian women. METHODS: A total of 562 healthy Iranian women completed a battery of questionnaires, including the P-FSDS-R, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS) and Locke-Wallace-Marital Adjustment Test (LWMAT). The factor structure and the convergent and divergent validity of the P-FSDS-R were examined, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson product-moment correlations, respectively. To examine the discriminant validity of the P-FSDS-R, data collected from 562 healthy participants were compared with data from 108 women with sexual problems who completed the P-FSDS-R measure. RESULTS: The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the P-FSDS-R is conceptualized within a one - factor model. The results also indicate that the P-FSDS-R has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Significant correlations in the predicted directions between the P-FSDS-R scores and the scores of DASS, PANAS and LWMAT support both the convergent and divergent validity of the FSDS-R. The results also indicate that the scores of the P-FSDS-R tests significantly differentiated women with and without sexual problems. CONCLUSIONS: In general, these findings support the reliability and the validity of the P-FSDS-R among Iranian women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FSDS-R has excellent reliability and good discriminant validity.
“The instrument has excellent reliability and good discriminant validity (Derogatis et al., 2008; Ghassami et al., 2014).”
From Internet-based treatment for vulvodynia (EMBLA) – Study protocol for a randomised controlled study (2021) · cites this paper as Ghassami et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Ghassami, M., Asghari, A., Shaeeri, M. R., Soltaninejad, Z., & Safarinejad, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Shahed University (IR)
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Shahed University
- Department of Urology, Clinical Center for Urological Disease Diagnosis and Private Clinic Specialized in Urological and Andrological Genetics
- Corresponding author
- Safarinejad, Mohammad R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-25
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-299
- ISSN
- 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1788
- OpenAlex
- W2320892920
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2026-07-05)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised, Persian version, psychometric properties, female sexual dysfunction, sexual distress, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, Iranian women
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Iran, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Women's Health, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review