Cited by 4Physiological and biochemical adaptationsCrustacean biology and ecologyMarine Biology and Ecology Research

A Comparative Study of the Respiratory Metabolism in Porcellio laevis(Lat.) and Armadillidium vulgare(Lat.): Response to Temperature, Photoperiod and Oxygen Concentration

Husain, M. Z., Alikhan, M. A.·1979·Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie

Abstract

Relationship of body weight, imposed fasting, temperature, light intensity, and oxygen concentration to oxygen consumption in Porcellio laevis and Armadillidium vulgare has been investigated in a series of laboratory experiments. It was observed that (1) the metabolic response in the two species to temperature change was a uniform increase of oxygen consumption with increasing temperature from 15 degrees C to 60 degrees C. Beyond 30 degrees C, the oxygen consumption in each species fell, and the thermal death point was reached at about 40 degrees C. (2) The response to decreasing oxygen concentrations was a corresponding decrease in oxygen consumption. Armadillidium vulgare was a partial regulator while Porcellio laevis was able to conform its internal state to the changing oxygen levels. (3) In each species there was a decrease in metabolic rate with increasing body weight. (4) On the basis of their general activity level and oxygen consumption rate, Porcellio appeared to be a nocturnal species, while Armadillidium had a day active metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/13813457909070530

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 4

Authors
Husain, M. Z., & Alikhan, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Laurentian University (CA)
Venue
Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie
Published
1979-01
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
697-710
ISSN
0003-9799 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109531633
Cited by
4
References
19
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
Porcellio laevis, Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, oxygen consumption, respiratory metabolism, temperature effects, photoperiod, oxygen concentration, thermal death point, body weight, fasting, nocturnal activity, metabolic rate
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Crustacea, Darkness, Female, Kinetics, Light, Male, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Partial Pressure, Sex Factors, Species Specificity, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review