Cited by 25Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer

Serum and plasma determination of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors yield different results: the need for standardization in clinical practice

Open access
Oggè, Giovanna, Romero, Roberto, Kusanovic, Juan Pedro, Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn, Dong, Zhong, Mittal, Pooja, Vaisbuch, Edi, Mazaki-Tovi, Shali +3 more·2010·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The importance of an anti-angiogenic state as a mechanism of disease in preeclampsia is now recognized. Assays for the determination of concentrations of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFR)-1, sVEGFR-2, placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble endoglin (sEng) have been developed for research and clinical laboratories. A key question is whether these factors should be measured in plasma or serum. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in the concentrations of these analytes between plasma and serum in normal pregnancy and in preeclampsia. METHODS: Samples of maternal blood were obtained by venipuncture and collected in EDTA (lavender top) and serum collection tubes (red top). A standard laboratory procedure was implemented for the centrifugation, aliquoting and storage of samples. Plasma and serum from 70 women with normal pregnancies and 34 patients with preeclampsia were assayed for sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, PlGF and sEng by ELISA. Nonparametric paired tests were used for analyses. RESULTS: A significant difference between plasma and serum concentration was observed for sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-2 in normal pregnancy, and for sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, PlGF and sEng in women with preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The concentrations of sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, PlGF and sEng when measured in maternal plasma and in serum are different. Therefore, the matrix used for the assay (serum versus plasma) needs to be considered when selecting thresholds for predictive studies and interpreting the growing body of literature on this subject.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767050903366119

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 25

Authors
Oggè, G., Romero, R., Kusanovic, J. P., Chaiworapongsa, T., Dong, Z., Mittal, P., Vaisbuch, E., Mazaki-Tovi, S., Gonzalez, J. M., Yeo, L., & Hassan, S. S.
Affiliations
United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Corresponding author
Romero, Roberto
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2010-02-16
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
820-827
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2010056890
Cited by
25
References
91
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Z01HD002400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Keywords
preeclampsia, angiogenic factors, anti-angiogenic factors, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, soluble VEGFR-2, placental growth factor, soluble endoglin, serum versus plasma, sample matrix, assay standardization, normal pregnancy, maternal blood biomarkers
MeSH terms
Endoglin, Placenta Growth Factor, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Plasma, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Proteins, Receptors, Cell Surface, Reference Standards, Antigens, CD, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2, Serum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review