Cited by 388Poisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

2010 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 28th Annual Report

Open access
Bronstein, Alvin C., Spyker, Daniel A., Cantilena, Louis R., Green, Jody L., Rumack, Barry H., Dart, Richard C.·2011·Clinical Toxicology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is the 28th Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS). All US poison centers upload case data automatically with a median time interval of 19.0 [11.9, 40.6] (median [25%, 75%]) minutes, creating a near real-time national exposure and information database and surveillance system. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the case data tabulating specific indices from NPDS. The methodology was similar to that of previous years. Where changes were introduced, the differences are identified. Poison center cases with medical outcomes of death were evaluated by a team of 33 medical and clinical toxicologist reviewers using an ordinal scale of 1 (Undoubtedly responsible) - 6 (Unknown) to determine Relative Contribution to Fatality (RCF) of the exposure to the death. RESULTS: In 2010, 3,952,772 closed encounters were logged by NPDS: 2,384,825, human exposures, 94,823 animal exposures, 1,466,253 information calls, 6537 human confirmed nonexposures, and 334 animal confirmed nonexposures. Total encounters showed a 7.7% decline from 2009 while health care facility calls increased by 2.7%. Human exposures with more serious outcomes (minor, moderate, major or death) increased 4.5% while those with less serious outcomes (all other medical outcome categories) decreased 5.9%. All information calls decreased 12.6% and health care facility (HCF) information calls decreased 13.6%, Drug ID calls decreased 10.9%, and human exposures decreased 3.8%. The top 5 substance classes most frequently involved in all human exposures were analgesics (11.5%), cosmetics/personal care products (7.7%), household cleaning substances (7.3%), sedatives/hypnotics/ antipsychotics (6.0%), and foreign bodies/toys/miscellaneous (4.2%). Analgesic exposures as a class increased the most rapidly by 32.8% over the last decade. The top f ve most common exposures in children age 5 years or less were cosmetics/personal care products (13.2%), analgesics (9.4%), household cleaning substances (9.2%), foreign bodies/toys/miscellaneous (7.2%), and topical preparations (6.8%). THC homolog and designer amphetamine ("Bath Salts") exposures were identified as emerging public health threats. Drug identification requests comprised 64.3% of all information calls. NPDS documented 1730 human exposures resulting in death with 1146 human fatalities judged related with an RCF of 1-Undoubtedly responsible, 2-Probably responsible, or 3-Contributory. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the continued value of poison center expertise and need for specialized medical toxicology information to manage the more severe exposures, despite a decrease in calls involving less severe exposures. Unintentional and intentional exposures continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. The near real-time, always current status of NPDS represents a national public health resource to collect and monitor US exposure cases and information calls. The continuing mission of NPDS is to provide a nationwide infrastructure for public health surveillance for all types of exposures, public health event identification, resilience response and situational awareness tracking. NPDS is a model system for the nation and global public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15563650.2011.635149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bronstein et al. identified 48,177 poison center calls related to caffeine consumption and 6,724 calls related specifically to energy drink consumption.

    “For example, Bronstein et al. (116) identified 48,177 poison center calls related to caffeine consumption and 6,724 calls related specifically to energy drink consumption.”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [116]

  • 55% of calls regarding caffeine consumption were related to unintentional exposures.

    “Seifert et al. (115) also reported that 55% of calls regarding caffeine consumption were related to unintentional exposures (115, 116).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [116]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 388

Authors
Bronstein, A. C., Spyker, D. A., Cantilena, L. R., Green, J. L., Rumack, B. H., & Dart, R. C.
Affiliations
American Association of Poison Control Centers (US)
Corresponding author
Bronstein, Alvin C.
Venue
Clinical Toxicology
Published
2011-12
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
910-941
ISSN
  • 0009-9309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3650
  • 1556-9519
OpenAlex
W2769004720
Cited by
388
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 51
FWCI
69.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
poison control centers, National Poison Data System, toxic exposure, poisoning surveillance, analgesic poisoning, analgesic overdose, children under five, household cleaning products, sedative-hypnotic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, foreign bodies
MeSH terms
Environmental Exposure, Humans, Poison Control Centers, Poisoning, Population Surveillance, Societies, United States, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review