The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Position Statement: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists
Abstract
In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is within 1 hour of ingestion. The administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to 1 hour previously; there are insufficient data to support or exclude its use after 1 hour of ingestion. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world
Eddleston, M. (2000) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/93.11.715 · Cited by 828
Pesticide exposure in children
Roberts, J. R., Karr, C. J., COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, Paulson, J. A., Brock-Utne, A. C., Brumberg, H. L., Campbell, C. C., Lanphear, B. P., Osterhoudt, K. C., Sandel, M. T., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2758 · Cited by 351
Multiple-dose activated charcoal in acute self-poisoning: a randomised controlled trial
Eddleston, M., Juszczak, E., Buckley, N. A., Senarathna, L., Mohamed, F., Dissanayake, W., Hittarage, A., Azher, S., Jeganathan, K., Jayamanne, S., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60270-6 · Cited by 227
Parental prevention practices for young children in the context of maternal depression
McLennan, J. D., & Kotelchuck, M. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.105.5.1090 · Cited by 170
Buckley, N. A., Buckley, N., Whyte, I. M., O'Connell, D. L., & Dawson, A. H. (1999) · Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.1081/clt-100102452 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 721-741
- ISSN
- 0731-3810 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W196129186
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position Statement: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/15563659709162569
- The paper
- Position Statement: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. (1997). Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563659709162569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.