Cited by 363Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The suicidal mind and brain: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies

Jollant, Fabrice, Lawrence, Natalia L., Olié, Emilie, Guillaume, Sébastien, Courtet, Philippe·2011·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. We aimed at reviewing studies exploring dysfunctional cognitive processes, and their neuroanatomical basis, in suicidal behaviour, and to develop a neurocognitive working model. Methods. A literature search was conducted. RESULTS. Several limitations were found. The main reported neuropsychological findings are a higher attention to specific negative emotional stimuli, impaired decision-making, lower problem-solving abilities, reduced verbal fluency, and possible reduced non-specific attention and reversal learning in suicide attempters. Neuroimaging studies mainly showed the involvement of ventrolateral orbital, dorsomedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, the anterior cingulate gyrus, and, to a lesser extent, the amygdala. In addition, alterations in white matter connections are suggested. CONCLUSIONS. These studies support the concept of alterations in suicidal behaviour distinct from those of comorbid disorders. We propose that a series of neurocognitive dysfunctions, some with trait-like characteristics, may facilitate the development of a suicidal crisis during stressful circumstances: (1) an altered modulation of value attribution, (2) an inadequate regulation of emotional and cognitive responses, and (3) a facilitation of acts in an emotional context. This preliminary model may represent a framework for the design of future studies on the pathophysiology, prediction and prevention of these complex human behaviours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15622975.2011.556200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 121 · Cited by 363

Authors
Jollant, F., Lawrence, N. L., Olié, E., Guillaume, S., & Courtet, P.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Jollant, Fabrice
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2011-03-08
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
319-339
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2115054317
Cited by
363
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
suicidal behavior, suicide attempts, neurocognitive impairment, decision-making impairment, problem solving, verbal fluency, reversal learning, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, white matter connections, value attribution, emotion regulation, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological, Suicide, Attempted, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review