Cited by 8Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The development of the Athens Emotional States Inventory (AESI): collection, validation and automatic processing of emotionally loaded sentences

Chaspari, Theodora, Soldatos, Constantin, Maragos, Petros·2015·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The development of ecologically valid procedures for collecting reliable and unbiased emotional data towards computer interfaces with social and affective intelligence targeting patients with mental disorders. METHODS: Following its development, presented with, the Athens Emotional States Inventory (AESI) proposes the design, recording and validation of an audiovisual database for five emotional states: anger, fear, joy, sadness and neutral. The items of the AESI consist of sentences each having content indicative of the corresponding emotion. Emotional content was assessed through a survey of 40 young participants with a questionnaire following the Latin square design. The emotional sentences that were correctly identified by 85% of the participants were recorded in a soundproof room with microphones and cameras. A preliminary validation of AESI is performed through automatic emotion recognition experiments from speech. RESULTS: The resulting database contains 696 recorded utterances in Greek language by 20 native speakers and has a total duration of approximately 28 min. Speech classification results yield accuracy up to 75.15% for automatically recognizing the emotions in AESI. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the usefulness of our approach for collecting emotional data with reliable content, balanced across classes and with reduced environmental variability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15622975.2015.1012228

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Study by Chaspari et al. showed that emotion classification in speech (Greek language) achieved accuracy up to 75.15%.

    “Study by Chaspari et al. showed that emotion classification in speech (Greek language) achieved accuracy up to 75.15% [41].”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [41]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 8

Authors
Chaspari, T., Soldatos, C., & Maragos, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Chaspari, Theodora
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
312-322
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2055433631
Cited by
8
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Santen
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
emotion induction, speech emotion recognition, automatic emotion recognition, emotional state, anger, fear, joy, sadness, Greek language, affective computing, mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Collection, Emotions, Greece, Humans, Language, Natural Language Processing, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review