Biomedical nanoparticles modulate specific CD4+T cell stimulation by inhibition of antigen processing in dendritic cells
Open accessAbstract
Understanding how nanoparticles may affect immune responses is an essential prerequisite to developing novel clinical applications. To investigate nanoparticle-dependent outcomes on immune responses, dendritic cells (DCs) were treated with model biomedical poly(vinylalcohol)-coated super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (PVA-SPIONs). PVA-SPIONs uptake by human monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) was analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS) and advanced imaging techniques. Viability, activation, function, and stimulatory capacity of MDDCs were assessed by FACS and an in vitro CD4+ T cell assay. PVA-SPION uptake was dose-dependent, decreased by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MDDC maturation at higher particle concentrations, and was inhibited by cytochalasin D pre-treatment. PVA-SPIONs did not alter surface marker expression (CD80, CD83, CD86, myeloid/plasmacytoid DC markers) or antigen-uptake, but decreased the capacity of MDDCs to process antigen, stimulate CD4+ T cells, and induce cytokines. The decreased antigen processing and CD4+ T cell stimulation capability of MDDCs following PVA-SPION treatment suggests that MDDCs may revert to a more functionally immature state following particle exposure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation of dendritic cells has been observed upon exposure to poly(vinylalcohol)-coated SPION.
“Additionally, activation of dendritic cells has been observed upon exposure to poly(vinylalcohol)-coated SPION [125].”
From Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications (2019) · cites this paper as [125]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Blank, F., Gerber, P., Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Sakulkhu, U., Salaklang, J., De Peyer, K., Gehr, P., Nicod, L. P., Hofmann, H., Geiser, T., Petri-Fink, A., & Von Garnier, C.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Fribourg (CH)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Venue
- Nanotoxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 606-621
- ISSN
- 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2105985995
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Locations
- Nanotoxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- biomedical nanoparticles, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, polyvinyl alcohol coating, dendritic cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, antigen processing, CD4+ T cell stimulation, nanoparticle uptake, dendritic cell maturation, lipopolysaccharide, cytochalasin D
- MeSH terms
- Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Ferric Compounds, Flow Cytometry, HLA-D Antigens, Humans, Lipopolysaccharides, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cytochalasin D, Apoptosis, Antigen Presentation, Magnetite Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review