Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers?

Tiede, Karen, Hanssen, Steffen Foss, Westerhoff, Paul, Fern, Gordon J., Hankin, Steven M., Aitken, Robert J., Chaudhry, Qasim, Boxall, Alistair B. A.·2015·Nanotoxicology

Abstract

This study explored the potential for engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) to contaminate the UK drinking water supplies and established the significance of the drinking water exposure route compared to other routes of human exposure. A review of the occurrence and quantities of ENPs in different product types on the UK market as well as release scenarios, their possible fate and behaviour in raw water and during drinking water treatment was performed. Based on the available data, all the ENPs which are likely to reach water sources were identified and categorized. Worst case concentrations of ENPs in raw water and treated drinking water, using a simple exposure model, were estimated and then qualitatively compared to available estimates for human exposure through other routes. A range of metal, metal oxide and organic-based ENPs were identified that have the potential to contaminate drinking waters. Worst case predicted concentrations in drinking waters were in the low- to sub-µg/l range and more realistic estimates were tens of ng/l or less. For the majority of product types, human exposure via drinking water was predicted to be less important than exposure via other routes. The exceptions were some clothing materials, paints and coatings and cleaning products containing Ag, Al, TiO2, Fe2O3 ENPs and carbon-based materials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17435390.2015.1022888

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.010 · DOI
  2. Boxall ABA, 2007, Current and predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles
  3. 10.2217/17435889.2.6.919 · DOI
  4. 10.1289/ehp.1104477 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.023 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.011 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/es9015553 · DOI
  8. Hansen SF, 2008, Nanotechnology Risks and Benefits, 363
  9. 10.1007/s10646-008-0210-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/17435390701727509 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.040 · DOI
  12. Johnson AC, 2011, Environ Toxicol Chem, 31, 2582, 10.1002/etc.1983 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X · DOI
  14. 10.1021/es800091f · DOI
  15. 10.1038/444267a · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es7029637 · DOI
  17. Musee N, 2012, Hum Exp Toxicol, 30, 1181, 10.1177/0960327110391387 · DOI
  18. Nishijima W, 1998, Water Sci Technol, 37, 117, 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00301-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/10807039.2010.501270 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/es60169a601 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/es204530n · DOI
  22. Rauscher H, 2014, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports
  23. 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00286-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.008 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052 · DOI
  26. Wijnhoven SWP, 2009, Exposure to nanomaterials in consumer products, RIVM Letter Report 340370001/2009
  27. 10.1080/00405000701757677 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00308-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Tiede, K., Hanssen, S. F., Westerhoff, P., Fern, G. J., Hankin, S. M., Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, Q., & Boxall, A. B. A.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2015-05-12
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1743-5390
  • 1743-5404
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17435390.2015.1022888
The paper
Tiede, K., Hanssen, S. F., Westerhoff, P., Fern, G. J., Hankin, S. M., Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, Q., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2015). How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers? Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2015.1022888