The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers?
Abstract
This study explored the potential for engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) to contaminate the UK drinking water supplies and established the significance of the drinking water exposure route compared to other routes of human exposure. A review of the occurrence and quantities of ENPs in different product types on the UK market as well as release scenarios, their possible fate and behaviour in raw water and during drinking water treatment was performed. Based on the available data, all the ENPs which are likely to reach water sources were identified and categorized. Worst case concentrations of ENPs in raw water and treated drinking water, using a simple exposure model, were estimated and then qualitatively compared to available estimates for human exposure through other routes. A range of metal, metal oxide and organic-based ENPs were identified that have the potential to contaminate drinking waters. Worst case predicted concentrations in drinking waters were in the low- to sub-µg/l range and more realistic estimates were tens of ng/l or less. For the majority of product types, human exposure via drinking water was predicted to be less important than exposure via other routes. The exceptions were some clothing materials, paints and coatings and cleaning products containing Ag, Al, TiO2, Fe2O3 ENPs and carbon-based materials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Engineered NPs have become a specific concern with respect to the human food chain [253, 254], and also drinking water supply with the potential applications of nanotechnology in disinfectants and filtration systems [255].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [255]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.010 · DOI
- Boxall ABA, 2007, Current and predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles
- 10.2217/17435889.2.6.919 · DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.1104477 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1021/es9015553 · DOI
- Hansen SF, 2008, Nanotechnology Risks and Benefits, 363
- 10.1007/s10646-008-0210-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/17435390701727509 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.040 · DOI
- Johnson AC, 2011, Environ Toxicol Chem, 31, 2582, 10.1002/etc.1983 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X · DOI
- 10.1021/es800091f · DOI
- 10.1038/444267a · DOI
- 10.1021/es7029637 · DOI
- Musee N, 2012, Hum Exp Toxicol, 30, 1181, 10.1177/0960327110391387 · DOI
- Nishijima W, 1998, Water Sci Technol, 37, 117, 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00301-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/10807039.2010.501270 · DOI
- 10.1021/es60169a601 · DOI
- 10.1021/es204530n · DOI
- Rauscher H, 2014, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports
- 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00286-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052 · DOI
- Wijnhoven SWP, 2009, Exposure to nanomaterials in consumer products, RIVM Letter Report 340370001/2009
- 10.1080/00405000701757677 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00308-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiede, K., Hanssen, S. F., Westerhoff, P., Fern, G. J., Hankin, S. M., Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, Q., & Boxall, A. B. A.
- Venue
- Nanotoxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-05-12
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1743-5390
- 1743-5404
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17435390.2015.1022888
- The paper
- Tiede, K., Hanssen, S. F., Westerhoff, P., Fern, G. J., Hankin, S. M., Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, Q., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2015). How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers? Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2015.1022888