The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures
Open accessAbstract
The natural course of ankle fractures was studied in 143 patients treated by closed methods. The average time elapsing from fracture to follow-up was 29 years. Eighty-two per cent had no radiographic signs of arthrosis; 83 per cent were free of symptoms. The most common fracture, supination eversion Stage II (49 cases), gave rise to minimal signs of arthrosis in only one patient, who had moderate symptoms. The suggestion that all ankle fractures must be perfectly reduced is not supported by the findings of the present study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Michelson, J. D. (1995) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199501000-00020 · Cited by 275
VANDER GRIEND, R., MICHELSON, J. D., & BONE, L. B. (1996) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199611000-00021 · Cited by 84
The isolated lateral malleolar fracture: where are we and how did we get here?
Smith, G. (2013) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2012.02.008 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, M., Jonsson, K., & Nilsson, B.
- Venue
- Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-106
- ISSN
- 0001-6470 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093259456
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17453678508994329
- The paper
- Bauer, M., Jonsson, K., & Nilsson, B. (1985). Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
