Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soft tissue sarcoma: Epidemiology and prognosis in 508 patients

Open access
Gustafson, Pelle·1994·Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Abstract

We have evaluated epidemiology, prognosis and the association between metastases and local recurrence in a series of adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity and trunk wall. 508 patients were diagnosed in the Southern Swedish Health Care Region from 1964 through 1989. The series was population-based, i.e., all patients within a defined area were included, irrespective of where treated, thereby avoiding selection bias in referral and follow-up. Epidemiology. The annual incidence was 18 per million. The median age was 64 years. One third of the tumors were subcutaneous, and these were smaller than the deep-seated tumors. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma and grade IV were the commonest. Differences were noted in clinicopathologic features among histotypes. The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate (MFSR) was 0.6. The crude local recurrence rate was 0.3. The majority of metastases and local recurrences occurred within 3 years. The referral pattern to the tumor center has become more favorable over time; in the last 5 years half of the subcutaneous and four fifths of the deep-seated tumors were referred before surgery. Prognostic factors. Tumor size, tumor necrosis, and vascular invasion were strong and independent prognostic factors for metastasis in a histologically mixed series. In MFH, storiform and pleomorphic subtype, tumor necrosis and tumor size were associated with a poor prognosis. Tumor necrosis and vascular invasion independently worsened the prognosis in leiomyosarcoma. In liposarcoma, tumor necrosis and in synovial sarcoma, tumor size were the only important prognostic factors. Tumor size, tumor necrosis, and vascular invasion were used in a prognostic system which identified two thirds of all patients with a 5-year MFSR of 0.8 and one third of the patients with a 5-year MFSR of 0.3. Metastasis and local recurrence. The causal association proposed for local recurrence and metastasis should be interpreted with caution. We suggest that highly malignant tumors combine local and distant aggressiveness, and that local recurrence is a marker of risk, and not necessarily a cause of, metastasis. Conclusions. 1. Population-based series are preferable when studying epidemiology in soft tissue sarcoma. 2. We propose that tumor size, tumor necrosis, and vascular invasion are strong and reliable factors that can be used to improve prognostic accuracy. 3. There is a growing body of evidence against a causal relationship between local recurrence and metastasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17453679409153928

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Gustafson, P.
Venue
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
Published
1994-01
Volume
65
Issue
sup259
Pages
2-31
ISSN
0001-6470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990942642
Cited by
253
References
20
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft tissue sarcoma: Epidemiology and prognosis in 508 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17453679409153928
The paper
Gustafson, P. (1994). Soft tissue sarcoma: Epidemiology and prognosis in 508 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679409153928

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.