The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales
Open accessAbstract
The Capnodiales incorporates plant and human pathogens, endophytes, saprobes and epiphytes, with a wide range of nutritional modes. Several species are lichenised, or occur as parasites on fungi, or animals. The aim of the present study was to use DNA sequence data of the nuclear ribosomal small and large subunit RNA genes to test the monophyly of the Capnodiales, and resolve families within the order. We designed primers to allow the amplification and sequencing of almost the complete nuclear ribosomal small and large subunit RNA genes. Other than the Capnodiaceae (sooty moulds), and the Davidiellaceae, which contains saprobes and plant pathogens, the order presently incorporates families of major plant pathological importance such as the Mycosphaerellaceae, Teratosphaeriaceae and Schizothyriaceae. The Piedraiaceae was not supported, but resolves in the Teratosphaeriaceae. The Dissoconiaceae is introduced as a new family to accommodate Dissoconium and Ramichloridium. Lichenisation, as well as the ability to be saprobic or plant pathogenic evolved more than once in several families, though the taxa in the upper clades of the tree lead us to conclude that the strictly plant pathogenic, nectrotrophic families evolved from saprobic ancestors (Capnodiaceae), which is the more primitive state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Cited by
Woudenberg, J. H. C., Groenewald, J. Z., Binder, M., & Crous, P. W. (2013) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0015 · Cited by 835
Self-citationFungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationIntroducing the Consolidated Species Concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae
Quaedvlieg, W., Binder, M., Groenewald, J. Z., Summerell, B. A., Carnegie, A. J., Burgess, T. I., & Crous, P. W. (2014) · Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi · doi:10.3767/003158514x681981 · Cited by 347
Self-citationA critical review on exploiting the pharmaceutical potential of plant endophytic fungi
Gupta, S., Chaturvedi, P., Kulkarni, M. G., & Van Staden, J. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107462 · Cited by 346
Wijayawardene, N. N., Hyde, K. D., Rajeshkumar, K. C., Hawksworth, D. L., Madrid, H., Kirk, P. M., Braun, U., Singh, R. V., Crous, P. W., Kukwa, M., et al. (2017) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-017-0386-0 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crous, P. W., Schoch, C. L., Hyde, K. D., Wood, A. R., Gueidan, C., de Hoog, G. S., & Groenewald, J. Z.
- Venue
- Studies in Mycology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 17-47
- ISSN
- 0166-0616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010156827
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3114/sim.2009.64.02
- The paper
- Crous, P. W., Schoch, C. L., Hyde, K. D., Wood, A. R., Gueidan, C., de Hoog, G. S., & Groenewald, J. Z. (2009). Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Studies in Mycology. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.02
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.