The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust temporal processing of news
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another temporal tagger is GUTime which extends the capabilities of TempEx [Mani and Wilson 2000] by adding TIMEX3 tags.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Mani and Wilson 2000
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals
Allen, J. F. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/182.358434 · Cited by 7,593 · cited 1×
“This representation treats points as primitive (as do (Bennett and Partee 1972), (Dowty 1979), among others); other representations treat intervals as primitive, e.g., (Allen 1983).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- J. Alexandersson, N. Riethinger, and E. Maier. Insights into the Dialogue Processing of VERBMOBIL. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 1997, 33-40.
- S. Busemann, T. Decleck, A. K. Diagne, L. Dini, J. Klein, and S. Schmeier. Natural Language Dialogue Service for Appointment Scheduling Agents. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 1997, 25-32.
- C. H. Hwang. A Logical Approach to Narrative Understanding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, U. of Alberta, 1992. ISO-8601 ftp://ftp.qsl.net/pub/g1smd/8601v03.pdf 1997.
- M. Moens and M. Steedman. Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 2, 1988, pp. 15-28. MUC-7. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference, DARPA. 1998.
- R. J. Passonneau. A Computational Model of the Semantics of Tense and Aspect. Computational Linguistics, 14, 2, 1988, pp. 44-60.
- A. Setzer and R. Gaizauskas. Annotating Events and Temporal Information in Newswire Texts. Proceedings of the Second International Conference On Language Resources And Evaluation (LREC-2000), Athens, Greece, 31 May-2 June 2000.
- F. Song and R. Cohen. Tense Interpretation in the Context of Narrative. Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artifical Intelligence (AAAI'91), pp.131-136. 1991. TDT2 http://morph.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/LDC99T3 7.html 1999
- B. Webber. Tense as Discourse Anaphor. Computational Linguistics, 14, 2, 1988, pp. 61-73.
- J. M. Wiebe, T. P. O'Hara, T. Ohrstrom- Sandgren, and K. J. McKeever. An Empirical Approach to Temporal Reference Resolution. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 9, 1998, pp. 247-293.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SUTime: A library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions
Chang, A. X., & Manning, C. (2012) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/5pi53hxdrsdt · Cited by 383
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Mani, I., & Wilson, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '00
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 69-76
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
