Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation

Open access
Fox, Heidi J.·2002·Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02

Abstract

There has been much interest in using phrasal movement to improve statistical machine translation.We explore how well phrases cohere across two languages, specifically English and French, and examine the particular conditions under which they do not.We demonstrate that while there are cases where coherence is poor, there are many regularities which can be exploited by a statistical machine translation system.We also compare three variant syntactic representations to determine which one has the best properties with respect to cohesion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/1118693.1118732

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Fox, H. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02
Published
2002
Volume
10
Pages
304-3111
OpenAlex
W2160382364
Cited by
164
References
1
FWCI
6.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1118693.1118732
The paper
Fox, H. J. (2002). Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02. https://doi.org/10.3115/1118693.1118732

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.