The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling
Open accessAbstract
Most current statistical natural language processing models use only local features so as to permit dynamic programming in inference, but this makes them unable to fully account for the long distance structure that is prevalent in language use. We show how to solve this dilemma with Gibbs sampling, a simple Monte Carlo method used to perform approximate inference in factored probabilistic models. By using simulated annealing in place of Viterbi decoding in sequence models such as HMMs, CMMs, and CRFs, it is possible to incorporate non-local structure while preserving tractable inference. We use this technique to augment an existing CRF-based information extraction system with long-distance dependency models, enforcing label consistency and extraction template consistency constraints. This technique results in an error reduction of up to 9% over state-of-the-art systems on two established information extraction tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451
Cited by
Knowledge Graph Embedding by Translating on Hyperplanes
Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Feng, J., & Chen, Z. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8870 · Cited by 3,915
Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data
Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., & Jurafsky, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2 - ACL-IJCNLP '09 · doi:10.3115/1690219.1690287 · Cited by 2,752
Neural Relation Extraction with Selective Attention over Instances
Lin, Y., Shen, S., Liu, Z., Luan, H., & Sun, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1200 · Cited by 1,021
The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures
Hope, O.-K., Hu, D., & Lu, H. (2016) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-016-9371-1 · Cited by 532
SUTime: A library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions
Chang, A. X., & Manning, C. (2012) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/5pi53hxdrsdt · Cited by 383
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 363-370
- OpenAlex
- W2096765155
- Cited by
- 3,008
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1219840.1219885
- The paper
- Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05. https://doi.org/10.3115/1219840.1219885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
