Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 594

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effective self-training for parsing

Open access
McClosky, David, Charniak, Eugene, Johnson, Mark·2006·Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics -

Abstract

We present a simple, but surprisingly effective, method of self-training a twophase parser-reranker system using readily available unlabeled data.We show that this type of bootstrapping is possible for parsing when the bootstrapped parses are processed by a discriminative reranker.Our improved model achieves an f -score of 92.1%, an absolute 1.1% improvement (12% error reduction) over the previous best result for Wall Street Journal parsing.Finally, we provide some analysis to better understand the phenomenon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/1220835.1220855

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 594

Metadata

Authors
McClosky, D., Charniak, E., & Johnson, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics -
Published
2006
Pages
152-159
OpenAlex
W2163568299
Cited by
594
References
18
FWCI
20.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective self-training for parsing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1220835.1220855
The paper
McClosky, D., Charniak, E., & Johnson, M. (2006). Effective self-training for parsing. Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics -. https://doi.org/10.3115/1220835.1220855

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.