Cited by 132Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorNatural Language Processing TechniquesAlgorithms and Data Compression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantifying query ambiguity

Open access
Cronen-Townsend, Steve, Croft, W. Bruce·2002·Proceedings of the second international conference on Human Language Technology Research -

Abstract

We develop a measure of a query with respect to a collection of documents with the aim of quantifying the query's ambiguity with respect to those documents. This measure, the clarity score, is the relative entropy between a query language model and the corresponding collection language model. We substantiate that the clarity score measures the coherence and specificity of the language used in documents likely to satisfy the query. We also argue that it provides a suitable quantification of the (lack of) ambiguity of a query with respect to a collection of documents and has potential applications throughout the field of information retrieval. In particular, the clarity score is shown to correlate positively with average precision in evaluations using TREC test collections. Hence, as one example, the clarity score could serve as a predictor of query performance. Systems would then be able to identify vague information requests and respond differently than they would to clear and specific requests.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/1289189.1289266

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Foundations of GenIR

    Ai, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842

    “As long studied in the IR community, the formulation of an effective query requires deep understanding of the user’s intent, and many of the important context information behind a user intent is not explicitly expressed in the words they wrote [115].”

See all 132

Metadata

Authors
Cronen-Townsend, S., & Croft, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the second international conference on Human Language Technology Research -
Published
2002
Pages
104
OpenAlex
W2030524533
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Human Language Technology Research (publishedVersion)
  • International Conference on Human Language Technology Research
Funders
National Science Foundation (9907018)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
query ambiguity, Kullback-Leibler divergence, query performance prediction, average precision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review