The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stanford typed dependencies representation
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the Stanford typed dependencies representation, which was designed to provide a straightforward description of grammatical relations for any user who could benefit from automatic text understanding. For such purposes, we argue that dependency schemes must follow a simple design and provide semantically contentful information, as well as offer an automatic procedure to extract the relations. We consider the underlying design principles of the Stanford scheme from this perspective, and compare it to the GR and PARC representations. Finally, we address the question of the suitability of the Stanford scheme for parser evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Cited by
A Survey of the Usages of Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing
Otter, D. W., Medina, J. R., & Kalita, J. K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2979670 · Cited by 1,836
The SIDER database of drugs and side effects
Kuhn, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J., & Bork, P. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1075 · Cited by 1,451
Dependency-Based Word Embeddings
Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-2050 · Cited by 1,047
Andreas, J., Rohrbach, M., Darrell, T., & Klein, D. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.12 · Cited by 908
Leveraging Linguistic Structure For Open Domain Information Extraction
Angeli, G., Johnson Premkumar, M. J., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1034 · Cited by 725
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D.
- Venue
- Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation - CrossParser '08
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2094061585
- Cited by
- 918
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Stanford typed dependencies representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1608858.1608859
- The paper
- de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). The Stanford typed dependencies representation. Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation - CrossParser '08. https://doi.org/10.3115/1608858.1608859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
