The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SemEval-2007 task 15: TempEval temporal relation identification
Open accessAbstract
The TempEval task proposes a simple way to evaluate automatic extraction of temporal relations. It avoids the pitfalls of evaluating a graph of inter-related labels by defining three sub tasks that allow pairwise evaluation of temporal relations. The task not only allows straightforward evaluation, it also avoids the complexities of full temporal parsing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals
Allen, J. F. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/182.358434 · Cited by 7,593 · cited 2×
“…subtasks are added to the entire temporal graph, it becomes possible to let confi-dence scores from the separate subtasks drive a constraint propagation algorithm as proposed in (Allen, 1983), in effect using high-precision relations to constrain lower-precision relations elsewhere in the graph.”
Method
Cited by
Coupled temporal scoping of relational facts
Talukdar, P. P., Wijaya, D., & Mitchell, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/2124295.2124307 · Cited by 46
Extraction of temporal facts and events from Wikipedia
Kuzey, E., & Weikum, G. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2nd Temporal Web Analytics Workshop · doi:10.1145/2169095.2169101 · Cited by 32
Classifying temporal relations in clinical data: A hybrid, knowledge-rich approach
D’Souza, J., & Ng, V. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.003 · Cited by 18
On the Temporal Relations between Logging and Code
Ding, Z., Tang, Y., Li, Y., Li, H., & Shang, W. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00079 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhagen, M., Gaizauskas, R., Schilder, F., Hepple, M., Katz, G., & Pustejovsky, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations - SemEval '07
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 75-80
- OpenAlex
- W1990886313
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
