Cited by 40Natural Language Processing TechniquesSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationSpeech and dialogue systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A stochastic approach to parsing

Open access
Sampson, Geoffrey·1986·Proceedings of the 11th coference on Computational linguistics -

Abstract

Article Free Access Share on A stochastic approach to parsing Author: Geoffrey Sampson University of Leeds University of LeedsView Profile Authors Info & Claims COLING '86: Proceedings of the 11th coference on Computational linguisticsAugust 1986 Pages 151–155https://doi.org/10.3115/991365.991407Online:25 August 1986Publication History 11citation210DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations11Total Downloads210Last 12 Months42Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/991365.991407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sampson, G.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Sampson, Geoffrey
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th coference on Computational linguistics -
Published
1986
Pages
151
ISSN
1525-2477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021021293
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
stochastic parsing, syntactic analysis, probabilistic grammars, natural language parsing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review