The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget's categories trained on large corpora
Abstract
This paper describes a program that disambiguates English word senses in unrestricted text using statistical models of the major Roget's Thesaurus categories. Roget's categories serve as approximations of conceptual classes. The categories listed for a word in Roget's index tend to correspond to sense distinctions; thus selecting the most likely category provides a useful level of sense disambiguation. The selection of categories is accomplished by identifying and weighting words that are indicative of each category when seen in context, using a Bayesian theoretical framework.Other statistical approaches have required special corpora or hand-labeled training examples for much of the lexicon. Our use of class models overcomes this knowledge acquisition bottleneck, enabling training on unrestricted monolingual text without human intervention. Applied to the 10 million word Grolier's Encyclopedia, the system correctly disambiguated 92% of the instances of 12 polysemous words that have been previously studied in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · doi:10.5555/176313.176316 · Cited by 2,892
Cited by
Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods
Yarowsky, D. (1995) · Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - · doi:10.3115/981658.981684 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationAutomated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Gale, W. A., Church, K. W., & Yarowsky, D. (1992) · Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language - HLT '91 · doi:10.3115/1075527.1075579 · Cited by 522
Self-citationBelongie, S., Carson, C., Greenspan, H., & Malik, J. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710790 · Cited by 474
Discovering users' topics of interest on twitter: a first look
Michelson, M., & Macskassy, S. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the fourth workshop on Analytics for noisy unstructured text data · doi:10.1145/1871840.1871852 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Yarowsky, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics -
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 454
- ISSN
- 1525-2477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040004971
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.