Cited by 80Natural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech Recognition and SynthesisTranslation Studies and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving SMT quality with morpho-syntactic analysis

Open access
Nießen, Sonja, Ney, Hermann·2000·Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics -

Abstract

In the framework of statistical machine translation (SMT), correspondences between the words in the source and the target language are learned from bilingual corpora on the basis of so-called alignment models. Many of the statistical systems use little or no linguistic knowledge to structure the underlying models. In this paper we argue that training data is typically not large enough to sufficiently represent the range of different phenomena in natural languages and that SMT can take advantage of the explicit introduction of some knowledge about the languages under consideration. The improvement of the translation results is demonstrated on two different German-English corpora.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/992730.992809

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Segmentation of morphologically complex words such as compounds is widely used for SMT.

    “The segmentation of morphologically complex words such as compounds is widely used for SMT, and various algorithms for morpheme segmentation have been investigated (Nießen and Ney, 2000;Koehn and Knight, 2003;Virpioja et al., 2007;Stallard et al., 2012).”

    From Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units (2016) · cites this paper as Nießen and Ney, 2000

    The German Compound Words section says the authors split German compounds into their components for statistical machine translation, and the Results section reports an improvement from splitting compounds. This supports the cited paper as an example of compound segmentation in SMT, but it does not establish that segmentation is widely used or that this paper investigated various morpheme-segmentation algorithms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. P.F. Brown, S.A. Della Pietra, V.J. Della Pietra, and ILL. Mercer. 1993. Mathematics of Statistical Machine %'ansla- tion: Parameter Estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263 311.
  2. Fred Karlsson. 1990. Constraint Grmnmar as a Frainework tbr Parsing Running Text. In PTvecedings of th, e 13th, hzternational Confer- cnce on Computational Linguistics, volume 3, pages 168-173, Helsinki, Finland.
  3. Sonja Niefien, Stephan Vogel, Hermann Ney, and Christoph Tilhnann. 1998. A DP based Search Algorithm tbr Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 36th An- nual Con:ferencc of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics and the 17th Interna- tional Conference on Computational Linguis- ties, pages 960 967, Montrdal, P.Q., Canada, August.
  4. Sonja Niefien, Franz loser Oeh, Gregor Leusch, and Hermaml Ney. 2000. An Ewfluation Tool tbr Machine %'anslation: Fast Evaluation for MT Research. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Rc- so'arccs and Evaluation, pages 39 45, Athens, Greece, May.
  5. Franz .losef Och and Hans Weber. 1998. hn- t)roving Statistical Natural Language ~:ans- lation with Categories and Rules. In Pro- eccdings of the 36th Annual Con.fcrcncc of th, e Association for Computational Linguis- tics and the 17th international Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 985-989, Montrdal, P.Q., Canada, August.
  6. Iq:anz ,loser Och, Christol)h Tillmmm, aim Her- maml Ney. 1999. hnproved Alignment Mod- els tbr Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Co~:ference on Empirical Methods in Natu~nl Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pages 20-28, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, June.
  7. Wolfgang Wahlster. 1993. Verl)mobih Transla- lion of Face-to-Face Dialogs. In Proceedings of the MT Summit IV, pages 127-135, Kobe, Japan.
  8. Ye-Yi Wang and Alex Waibel. 1997. Decod- ing Algorithm in Statistical %'anslation. In Proceedings of the A CL/EA CL '97, Madrid, Spain, pages 366 372, July.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nießen, S., & Ney, H.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics -
Published
2000
Volume
2
Pages
1081
ISSN
1525-2477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015350341
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
Keywords
statistical machine translation, morphosyntactic analysis, alignment model, bilingual corpus, German-English translation, translation quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review