The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Your click decides your fate: Inferring Information Processing and Attrition Behavior from MOOC Video Clickstream Interactions
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we explore video lecture interaction in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), which is central to student learning experience on these educational platforms.As a research contribution, we operationalize video lecture clickstreams of students into cognitively plausible higher level behaviors, and construct a quantitative information processing index, which can aid instructors to better understand MOOC hurdles and reason about unsatisfactory learning outcomes.Our results illustrate how such a metric inspired by cognitive psychology can help answer critical questions regarding students' engagement, their future click interactions and participation trajectories that lead to in-video & course dropouts.Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The limited capacity model of mediated message processing
Lang, A. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x · Cited by 2,153 · cited 1×
“In this work, we try to construct students’ information processing index, based on the “Limited Capacity Information Processing Approach” (Basil, 1994; Lang et al., 1996; Lang, 2000), which asserts that people independently allocate limited amount of cognitive resources to tasks from a shared pool.”
Method
Cited by
Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC
Koedinger, K. R., Kim, J., Jia, J. Z., McLaughlin, E. A., & Bier, N. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/2724660.2724681 · Cited by 271
The Evolution of Research on Digital Education
Dillenbourg, P. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinha, T., Jermann, P., Li, N., & Dillenbourg, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 3-14
- OpenAlex
- W1948795633
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Your click decides your fate: Inferring Information Processing and Attrition Behavior from MOOC Video Clickstream Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/v1/w14-4102
- The paper
- Sinha, T., Jermann, P., Li, N., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Your click decides your fate: Inferring Information Processing and Attrition Behavior from MOOC Video Clickstream Interactions. Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-4102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
