The COVID States Project #57: Social media news consumption and COVID-19 vaccination rates
Open accessAbstract
Earlier this month, we witnessed a vigorous back and forth between the White House and Facebook regarding the role of the company in circulating health misinformation. On the White House side, the Surgeon General released an Advisory declaring misinformation a public health threat to the nation, highlighting, in part, the role of social media. This was followed the next day by a pointed statement by President Biden-- “They’re killing us!” Facebook responded with a blog entry, Moving Past the Finger Pointing, asserting that it was not responsible for the plateauing vaccination rates in the US. The company pointed to the fact that 85% of Facebook users in a large survey by Carnegie Mellon (supported by Facebook) reported being vaccinated or wanting to be vaccinated. This exchange begs an obvious question: who has it right? Answering this question is tricky; but at minimum, rebutting the President’s accusation would require more information than is provided in Facebook’s blog post. For one thing, it fails to compare Facebook users to non-users. It also does not provide information on vaccination rates among those Facebook users who actually get information regarding COVID-19 from Facebook. As most Americans use Facebook, the vaccination rates among users will inevitably be similar to those of the general population. But only a subset of those users go to Facebook specifically to get news and information about COVID-19. These are the people who the Biden administration worries are at risk of exposure to vaccine misinformation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People who got their news primarily from Facebook were even more vaccine hesitant than those who got their news primarily from Fox News.
“Facebook were even more vaccine hesitant than those who got their news primarily from Fox News (Lazer et al. 2021).”
From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Lazer et al. 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Bavel, J. J., Robertson, C. E., del Rosario, K., Rasmussen, J., & Rathje, S. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Suhaimi, N., Yongsatianchot, N., Gaggiano, J. D., Kim, M., Patel, S. A., Sun, Y., Marsella, S., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501889 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lazer, D., Green, J., Ognyanova, K., Baum, M., Lin, J., Druckman, J., Perlis, R., Santillana, M., & Uslu, A.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- ORCID
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- OpenAlex
- W4250728453
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2029292)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccination rates, social media news consumption, health misinformation, Facebook, vaccine hesitancy, platform liability, COVID-19 information sources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review