PreprintCited by 21Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Episodic retrieval for model-based evaluation in sequential decision tasks

Open access

Abstract

It has long been hypothesized that episodic memory supports adaptive decision making by enabling mental simulation of future events. Yet, memory research is often carried out in settings that are far removed from ecological contexts of decision making, and models of adaptive choice, conversely, only invoke episodic memory in highly stylized terms, if it all. To address these gaps, we propose a novel process-level model of choice that grounds model-based evaluation in empirically informed dynamics of episodic recall. In this model, the probability of retrieving each available memory sample is given by the Successor Representation (SR), a biologically plausible world model in reinforcement learning. The evolution of these probabilities based on past retrievals, in turn, is dictated by the Temporal Context Model (TCM), a prominent model of episodic retrieval. Through a series of simulations, we demonstrate that the patterns of episodic retrieval suggested by this model enables flexible computation of decision variables. On this basis, we argue that a number of previously described features of episodic memory serve an adaptive purpose in sequential decision making. For instance, we show that the classic retrieval bias known as contiguity effect, when viewed from a decision making perspective, leads to model-based rollouts for forward simulation. We also show that features of episodic memory such as emotional modulation enable generalization and efficient decisions given limited experience. By bridging theoretical models across these two domains, we make a set of theoretical predictions linking episodic memory properties to adaptive choice in sequential tasks that may guide future empirical endeavors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/3sqjh

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initiating the tree search with a retrieval context c0 that is associated with but different from the query stimulus feature vector can lead to bidirectional retrieval.

    “Finally, the authors show how initiating the tree search with a retrieval context c0 that is associated with but different from the query stimulus feature vector φ(s̃0) can lead to bidirectional retrieval.”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al. (2023)

    The section “Retrieving a learned context allows backward sampling” says that updating temporal context with a retrieved stimulus’s associated context, rather than its feature representation, allows both forward and backward retrieval. Figure 6 also shows retrieval initiated from a state. The cited passages do not establish that using an associated context specifically to initialize c0, rather than to update context after retrieval, produces the bidirectional effect; that distinction is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Zhou et al. (2023) proposed a theoretical model that builds upon links between TCM and SR, showing how a predictive version of TCM can support adaptive decision making.

    “These loosely connected ideas were knitted together in a theoretical proposal by Zhou et al. (2023) that builds upon the links between TCM and the SR, showing precisely how a predictive version of TCM can support adaptive decision making.”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al. (2023)

  • Emotionally salient stimuli, such as high rewards, can modulate learning by producing a higher learning rate for the SR update.

    “The authors also demonstrate how emotionally salient stimuli, such as high rewards, can modulate learning by producing a higher learning rate for the SR update (Eq. 78).”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al. (2023)

  • The modeling and simulation results of Zhou et al. (2023) demonstrate how a variant of TCM can be viewed as an estimator of the SR, and can serve as the basis for a flexible sampling-based decision algorithm that spans the continuum between vanilla SR and fully model-based search.

    “the modeling and simulation results of Zhou et al. (2023) demonstrate how a variant of TCM can be viewed as an estimator of the SR, and can serve as the basis for a flexible sampling-based decision algorithm that spans the continuum between vanilla SR and fully model-based search.”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al. (2023)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Bakkour, A., Palombo, D. J., Zylberberg, A., Kang, Y. H., Reid, A., Verfaellie, M., ... Shohamy, D. (2019, jul). The hippocampus supports deliberation during value-based decisions. eLife , 8 , e46080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46080 · DOI
  2. Bornstein, A. M., Khaw, M. W., Shohamy, D., & Daw, N. (2017, 06). Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans. Nature Communications , 8 , 15958. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15958 · DOI
  3. Cohen, R. T., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Retrieved-context theory of memory in emotional disorders. bioRxiv , 817486.
  4. Daw, N. D., & Dayan, P. (2014). The algorithmic anatomy of model-based evaluation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 369 (1655), 20130478.
  5. Dayan, P. (1993). Improving generalization for temporal difference learning: The successor representation. Neural Computation , 5 (4), 613-624. doi: 10.1162/neco.1993.5.4.613 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gershman, S. J. (2018). The successor representation: Its computational logic and neural substrates. The Journal of Neuroscience , 38 , 7193 - 7200.
  7. Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017). Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: An integrative framework. Annual Review of Psychology , 68 , 101-128.
  8. Greene, R. L. (1986). A common basis for recency effects in immediate and delayed recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 12 (3), 413-418. doi: 10.1037/02787393.12.3.413 · DOI
  9. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition , 25 4 , 923-41.
  10. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 46 (3), 269-299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.2001.1388 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Howard, M. W., Youker, T. E., & Venkatadass, V. S. (2008). The persistence of memory: Contiguity effects across hundreds of seconds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 15 , 58-63.
  12. Keramati, M., Dezfouli, A., & Piray, P. (2011). Speed/accuracy trade-off between the habitual and the goal-directed processes. PLoS computational biology , 7 (5), e1002055.
  13. Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2016). What learning systems do intelligent agents need? complementary learning systems theory updated. Trends in cognitive sciences , 20 (7), 512534.
  14. Lehnert, L., Tellex, S., & Littman, M. L. (2017). Advantages and limitations of using successor features for transfer in reinforcement learning. ArXiv , abs/1708.00102 . · arXiv
  15. Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., & Hsu, M. (2018). Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychological Review , 125 , 1-32.
  16. Mattar, M. G., & Daw, N. D. (2018). Prioritized memory access explains planning and hippocampal replay. Nature neuroscience , 21 (11), 1609-1617.
  17. Momennejad, I., Russek, E., Cheong, J., Botvinick, M., Daw, N., & Gershman, S. (2017). The successor representation in human reinforcement learning. Nature Human Behavior , 1 (9), 680-692. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0180-8 · DOI
  18. O'Reilly, R. C., Bhattacharyya, R., Howard, M. D., & Ketz, N. (2014). Complementary learning systems. Cognitive science , 38 (6), 1229-1248.
  19. Piray, P., & Daw, N. D. (2021). Linear reinforcement learning in planning, grid fields, and cognitive control. Nature communications , 12 (1), 4942.
  20. Plonsky, O., Teodorescu, K., & Erev, I. (2015). Reliance on small samples, the wavy recency effect, and similarity-based learning. Psychological review , 122 4 , 621-47.
  21. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological review , 116 (1), 129.
  22. Ritter, S., Wang, J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Jayakumar, S., Blundell, C., Pascanu, R., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Been there, done that: Meta-learning with episodic recall. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 4354-4363).
  23. Russek, E. M., Momennejad, I., Botvinick, M. M., Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2021). Neural evidence for the successor representation in choice evaluation. bioRxiv . Retrieved from https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/31/2021.08.29.458114 doi: 10.1101/2021.08.29.458114 · DOI
  24. Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological review , 115 (4), 893.
  25. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., Van Den Driessche, G., ... others (2016). Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. nature , 529 (7587), 484489.
  26. Stachenfeld, K. L., Botvinick, M. M., & Gershman, S. J. (2017). The hippocampus as a predictive map. Nature neuroscience , 20 (11), 1643-1653.
  27. Stefanidi, A., Ellis, D. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Free recall dynamics in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language .
  28. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction . MIT press.
  29. Talmi, D., Lohnas, L. J., & Daw, N. D. (2019). A retrieved context model of the emotional modulation of memory. Psychological review , 126 4 , 455-485.
  30. Tesauro, G., & Galperin, G. (1996). On-line policy improvement using monte-carlo search. In M. Mozer, M. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 9). MIT Press.
  31. Tulving, E. (1972). Organization of memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), (p. 381-402). Academic Press.
  32. Vikbladh, O. M., Meager, M. R., King, J., Blackmon, K., Devinsky, O., Shohamy, D., ... Daw, N. D. (2019). Hippocampal contributions to model-based planning and spatial memory. Neuron , 102 (3), 683693.
  33. Vul, E., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). One and done? optimal decisions from very few samples. Cognitive science , 38 (4), 599-637.
  34. Zhou, C. Y., Guo, D., & Yu, A. J. (2020). Devaluation of unchosen options: A bayesian account of the provenance and maintenance of overly optimistic expectations. In Cogsci 2020 (Vol. 42, p. 16821688).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, C. Y., Talmi, D., Daw, N., & Mattar, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2023-02-14
Volume
132
Issue
1
Pages
18-49
ISSN
0033-295X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405906861
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1822571)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, episodic memory retrieval, model-based decision making, sequential decision making, successor representation, mental simulation, emotional modulation, adaptive choice, memory generalization
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Mental Recall, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review