PreprintCited by 8Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

An Automated Online Assessment for Misophonia: The Sussex Misophonia Scale for Adults

Open access
Rinaldi, Louisa J, Ward, Jamie, Simner, J.·2021

Abstract

ObjectiveMisophonia is an unusually strong aversion to a specific class of sounds – most often human bodily sounds (e.g., chewing, breathing). There are a growing number of misophonia questionnaires, but these are pencil-and-paper tasks (or word/pdf alternatives) which make it difficult to distribute them globally or administer online, and time-consuming to score by hand. Here we present an online interactive assessment tool for misophonia (Sussex Misophonia Scale for Adults; SMS-Adult), embedded in an open-access testing platform with automated scoring, and a results-portal to share data ethically between patient/participants and professionals. Here we describe our tool and platform, alongside validations showing its sensitivity/ specificity, and an exploratory factor analysis revealing its factor structure.MethodsWe programmed our tool online with content management software to give it an interactive interface and automated scoring protocol. We then validated our questionnaire in a sample of n501 adults (mean age 25.34, SD 14.29) including people with and without misophonia. Participants completed our misophonia instrument (SMS-adult) alongside a second measure of misophonia to provide concurrent validity (the Misophonia Questionnaire, MQ; (Wu et al., 2014). ResultsWe examined the Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) of our instrument (Mehdi & Ahmadi, 2011) which showed it to be an “excellent” tool for separating misophonics from controls. We provided concurrent validati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/5eb39

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 8

Authors
Rinaldi, L. J., Ward, J., & Simner, J.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Published
2021-12-01
OpenAlex
W4200124267
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
misophonia, online assessment tools, automated grading, questionnaire validation, factor structure, sound sensitivity, interpersonal reactivity, pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review