The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The changes of suicidal ideation status among young people in Hong Kong during COVID-19: A longitudinal survey
Open accessAbstract
Background: Pandemics affect the physical and mental well-being of all potentially at-risk individuals. The secondary consequences of measures to prevent the outbreak (i.e., school closures) have extensive impact on young people globally. This longitudinal study examines changes of suicidal ideation status among adolescents during COVID-19.Method: A follow-up after nine-months of a school-based survey among 1,491 secondary students was conducted during COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Psychological well-being, psychological factors, family support, and COVID-19-related experiences were examined.Findings: The prevalence of suicidal ideation were 24% and 21% among the participants before and during COVID-19, respectively. In particular, 897 (65.0%) remained non-suicidal, 193 (14.0%) recovered from being suicidal, 148 (10.7%) newly reported being suicidal, and 143 (10.4%) remained suicidal. Respondents who remained suicidal were found to have significantly higher depression, anxiety, stress, loneliness, and social anxiety; fixed mindset; lower meaning of life and self-control; and lower parental support and supervision than the other groups. Participants with suicidal ideation reported more negative perceptions about the pandemic than non-suicidal participants. Logistic regression showed that participants with higher trait anxiety and higher stress from self-expectations in the baseline survey predicted higher likelihood of having suicidal ideation than the non-suicidal students at follow-up.Conclusion: Poor psychological well-being, lower level of family support, and negative impacts of the pandemic were consistently associated with students’ presence of suicidal ideation during the pandemic. Further intervention studies are needed to examine the effects of the mental health consequences of COVID-19 on youth mental health and to promote positive youth well-being.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, higher loneliness predicted higher pandemic non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) frequency for adolescents with lower pre-pandemic NSSI frequency but predicted lower NSSI pandemic frequency among adolescents with higher pre-pandemic NSSI frequency.”
From Loneliness and Well-Being in Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, higher loneliness predicted increased depression and suicide risk, in particular for adolescents with higher levels of pre-pandemic depression and suicide risk.”
From Loneliness and Well-Being in Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“There were seven out of 11 studies with a pre-pandemic assessment that generally showed increases in loneliness and/or loneliness as a predictor of poorer well-being (e.g., [62,64,66]).”
From Loneliness and Well-Being in Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“However, several studies revealed some complex interactive effects such that more adverse impacts of loneliness were evident for adolescents with poorer pre-pandemic well-being [64,66].”
From Loneliness and Well-Being in Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farrell, A. H., Vitoroulis, I., Eriksson, M., & Vaillancourt, T. (2023) · Children · doi:10.3390/children10020279 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHU, S., Zhuang, Y., Lee, P., & Ching, W. W.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- ZHU, Shimin
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 294
- Pages
- 151-158
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9757145
- OpenAlex
- W3170539243
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (25605418)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- suicidal ideation, adolescents, COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health, psychological well-being, depression, anxiety, loneliness, parental support, family supervision, fixed mindset, meaning in life, self-control, life satisfaction, public perception of COVID-19, Hong Kong
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Hong Kong, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Risk Factors, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review