Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword
Open accessAbstract
Social learning is fundamental to human development, helping individuals adapt to new conditions and cooperate in groups. During the formative years of adolescence, the social environment shapes people’s socio-cognitive skills needed in adulthood. Yet, peer influence during this pivotal developmental stage is generally associated with risky and unruly conduct, with eminent negative long-term effects on adolescents’ educational, economic and health outcomes. Here we show, in contrast to this traditional view, that the impact of peers on adolescents’ behaviour can also be markedly positive. Exposure to disobedient peers provoked rule breaking, and selfish peers reduced prosocial behaviour, particularly in early adolescence. However, compliant peers also promoted rule-following and fair peers increased prosociality. A belief formation task further revealed that early adolescents tend to assimilate social information, while older adolescents prioritise personal views. Our results suggest that these developmental patterns reflect a decline in an underlying domain-general factor of social sensitivity during adolescence, and highlight early adolescence as a key window for peer-based interventions to improve developmental trajectories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Substantial changes in social exposure and orientation take place during adolescence, with more time spent with peers than family, increased influence of friends/peers, and decreased influence of parents/adults.
“Substantial changes in social exposure and orientation take place during adolescence, as more time is spent with peers than with family, 131-134 the influence of friends or peers increases, and the influence of parents or adults decreases (appendix p 11). 135,136”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [136]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health
McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Dalal, N., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Blakemore, S.-J., Browne, V., Dooley, B., Hickie, I. B., Jones, P. B., McDaid, D., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00163-9 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
- Authors
- Molleman, L., Ciranka, S. K., & van den Bos, W.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Molleman, Lucas
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2021-02-15
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 1977
- Pages
- 20220045-20220045
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9240690
- OpenAlex
- W4283693716
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology (COMP2PSYCH)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-VIDI016, 016.Vidi.185.068, ERC-2018-StG-803338)
- Jacobs Foundation (ERC-2018-StG-803338, IMPRS COMP2PSYCH)
- International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
- Amsterdam Brain and Cognition
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- peer influence, social learning, adolescence, prosocial behavior, rule compliance, rule violations, selfishness, compliance, fairness, belief formation, social information use, peer effects, socio-cognitive development, peer intervention
- MeSH terms
- Peer Influence, Social Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Educational Status, Humans, Peer Group, Social Environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review