PreprintCited by 1

Preregistered Replication of “Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority”

Harris, Elizabeth Ann, Van Bavel, Jay Joseph·2020

Abstract

There is currently a debate in political psychology about whether dogmatism and belief superiority are symmetric or asymmetric across the ideological spectrum. One study found that dogmatism was higher amongst conservatives than liberals, but both conservatives and liberals with extreme attitudes reported higher perceived belief superiority (Toner, Leary, Asher & Jongman-Sereno, 2013). Our goal was to conduct a pre-registered direct and conceptual replication of this previous research using a larger and more nationally representative sample. Consistent with prior research, we found that conservatives had higher dogmatism scores than liberals while both conservatives and liberals with extreme attitudes were associated with higher belief superiority compared to those with more moderate attitudes. Moreover, whether conservative or liberal attitudes were associated with higher belief superiority was topic dependent. Different from prior research, we found that ideologically extreme individuals had higher dogmatism. We discuss the implications of these results for theoretical debates in political psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/hfuas

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extremists tend to be dogmatic and present their beliefs as facts.

    “Extremists tend to be dogmatic and to present their beliefs as facts (Harris & Van Bavel 2020, Toner et al. 2013), and they may incite others to become more ideologically polarized.”

    From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Harris & Van Bavel 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, E. A., & Van Bavel, J. J.
Affiliations
New York University
Published
2020-05-20
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review