The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparable attenuation of facial emotion recognition in adults with ASD or ADHD
Abstract
People with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been shown to take longer to recognise emotions associated with facial expressions. While this effect has been sufficiently documented, less attention has been given to its specificity. Since both disorders lead to increased reaction times on a wide variety of tasks, it is unclear whether differences in reaction times are specific to emotion recognition processes or due to attenuations of more basic sensory or motor processes. Therefore, we pair the use of a sensitive morphing task assessing emotion discrimination threshold, i.e. how much information is needed to correctly recognise an emotion, with a control task measuring species discrimination threshold. We hypothesise specific increases of emotion discrimination threshold in adults with ADHD or ASD, and differences in gaze patterns, specifically in dwell times and number of saccades. Our data supports differences in facial emotion recognition between adults with ADHD or ASD and a comparison group without any neurological or psychiatric disorders. Importantly, emotion discrimination thresholds were equivalent in adults with ADHD and ASD when including performance in the control task in the model. However, there were no differences between groups in terms of gaze patterns, suggesting that differences in facial emotion recognition were not due to differences in attention to facial landmarks or information gathering strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the participants in the clinical and comparison groups also completed behavioural tasks outside of the scanner where we found credible differences between the groups, including increased discrimination thresholds for recognising emotions based on facial expressions (Plank et al., 2024).”
From Are prediction error modifications domain specific in autism but domain general in ADHD? (2025) · cites this paper as Plank et al., 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Are prediction error modifications domain specific in autism but domain general in ADHD?
Plank, I. S., Yurova, A., Pior, A., Nowak, J., Bierlich, A. M., Papazov, B., Shi, Z., & Falter-Wagner, C. M. (2025) · Imaging neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.942 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Plank, I. S., Pior, A., Nowak, J., & Falter-Wagner, C.
- ORCID
- Plank, Irene Sophia
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2024-09-10
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review