CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 343Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCOVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the Associations Between Resilience, Dispositional Hope, Preventive Behaviours, Subjective Well-Being, and Psychological Health Among Adults During Early Stage of COVID-19

Open access
Yıldırım, Murat, Arslan, Gökmen·2020·Current Psychology
DOI 10.31234/osf.io/vpu5qPMC PMC7666616
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

During the pandemic, people may experience various mental health problems. Psychological strengths may help them to cope with emerging challenges and foster mental health and well-being. This study examined the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. A total of 220 participants from general public participated this study completing a battery of measures (134 men [M age = 42.36 years, SD = 8.99, range = 18 to 60] and 86 women [M age = 36.73 years, SD = 7.44, range = 18 to 51]). This cross-section study indicated that resilience mediated the relationship between hope and psychological health and subjective well-being. Results also showed that hope, and resilience had significant direct effects on psychological health, and subjective well-being while preventive behaviours did not manifest a significant effect on these two variables except on resilience. Preventive behaviours mediated the relationship between hope and resilience. The results suggest that we should more pay attention to hope and resilience for the development and improvement of well-being and psychological health during the times of crisis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/vpu5q

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

3 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Doğan, T. (2015). Adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102.
  2. Leipold, B., & Greve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14(1), 40-50.
  3. Tarhan, S., & Bacanlı, H. (2015). Adaptation of dispositional hope scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being,3(1), 1-14.
  4. Yildirim, M., & Belen, H. (2019). The role of resilience in the relationships between externality of happiness and subjective well-being and flourishing: A structural equation model approach. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 3(1), 62-76.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–343 of 343

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yıldırım, M., & Arslan, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Yıldırım, Murat
ORCID
Venue
Current Psychology
Publisher
Center for Open Science
Published
2020-04-28
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
5712-5722
ISSN
1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/vpu5q
PMC
PMC7666616
OpenAlex
W3102252000
Cited by
343
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 17
FWCI
51.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (unspecified)
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behavior, subjective well-being, mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, adults, mediation, psychological strengths, coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review