Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

Van Bavel, Jay Joseph, Baicker, Katherine, Boggio, Paulo, Capraro, Valerio, Cichocka, Aleksandra, Crockett, Molly, Cikara, Mina, Crum, Alia, Douglas, Karen, Druckman, James, Drury, John, Dube, Oeindrila, Ellemers, Naomi, Finkel, Eli, Fowler, James, Gelfand, Michele, Han, Shihui, Haslam, S. Alexander, Jetten, Jolanda, Kitayama, Shinobu, mobbs, dean, Napper, Lucy E., Packer, Dominic, Pennycook, Gordon, Peters, Ellen, Petty, Richard, Rand, David Gertler, Reicher, Stephen, Schnall, Simone, Shariff, Azim, Smith, Sandra Sandra, Skitka, Linda, Sunstein, Cass R., Tabri, Nassim, Tucker, Joshua A, Linden, Sander van der, van Lange, Paul, Weeden, Kim A, Wohl, Michael Jeremy Adam, zaki, jamil, Zion, Sean, Willer, Robb·2020

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behavior with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and also highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/y38m9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Crockett, M., Cikara, M., Crum, A., Douglas, K., Druckman, J., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E., Fowler, J., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Kitayama, S., mobbs, D., Napper, L. E., Packer, D., Pennycook, G., Peters, E., Petty, R., Rand, D. G., Reicher, S., Schnall, S., Shariff, A., Smith, S. S., Skitka, L., Sunstein, C. R., Tabri, N., Tucker, J. A., Linden, S. V. D., van Lange, P., Weeden, K. A., Wohl, M. J. A., zaki, J., Zion, S., & Willer, R.
Published
2020-03-24
OpenAlex
W3134540644
Cited by
612
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31234/osf.io/y38m9
The paper
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Crockett, M., Cikara, M., Crum, A., Douglas, K., Druckman, J., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E., Fowler, J., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., . . . Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y38m9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.