Problematic Media Use and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression During the Pandemic: An Investigation among Peruvian Adolescents in low-and middle-income Settings
Open accessAbstract
Problematic media use (PMU), or the excessive use of digital media that hinders an adolescent’s functioning, has gained concerns, especially during the COVID-19 lockdowns. Using a large sample of low-and middle-income youth living in Perú, we examined rates of PMU during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic including the effects of gender and school grade level. In a subset of the sample with pre-COVID-19 data, we examined whether PMU increased during the pandemic and if anxiety and depression symptoms (pre-COVID-19) predicted an increase in PMU during the pandemic. Results showed that 7.8% of adolescents endorsed higher PMU scores in the “Problematic use” category with older adolescents endorsing higher PMU scores, with similar levels for boys and girls. In the sample with pre-COVID-19 data, main effect models revealed that PMU did not increase overall; however, depression and anxiety symptoms at time 1 significantly predicted higher PMU at time 2 (when controlling for time 1 PMU).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teens who experience challenges with emotion regulation, executive function and impulsivity (e.g., ADHD), or social interactions (autism spectrum disorder) may experience more adverse effects from digital media.
“Teens who experience challenges with emotion regulation,129 executive function and impulsivity (eg, ADHD),61,130,131 or social interactions (autism spectrum disorder)132 may experience more adverse effects from digital media.”
From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [130]
School-aged children and teens who experience challenges with emotion regulation, executive function, impulsivity, or social interactions may have a greater likelihood of experiencing problematic internet use.
“School-aged children and teens who experience challenges with emotion regulation (social anxiety, mood conditions, stress),129 executive function, and impulsivity (ADHD)61,130,131 or social interactions (autism spectrum disorder)132 may have a greater likelihood of experiencing problematic internet use.”
From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [130]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report
Munzer, T., Milkovich, L. M., Madigan, S., Tomopoulos, S., Parga-Belinkie, J., Ajumobi, T., Cross, C., Gerwin, R., Council on Communications and Media, Radesky, J., et al. (2026) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2025-075321 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Developing Healthy Social Media Practices: An Outpatient Caregiver-Adolescent Group Intervention
Borgen, A. L., & Domoff, S. E. (2023) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-022-09559-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Magis-Weinberg, L., Domoff, S., Muñoz Lopez, D. E., Berger, E., Zimbalist, A., & Dahl, R.
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2021-07-19
- OpenAlex
- W4244458008
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- problematic media use, adolescents, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, gender differences, grade level, low- and middle-income countries, Peru, digital media use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review