The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do parental leaves make the motherhood wage penalty worse? Assessing two decades of German reforms
Abstract
Women-friendly policies may have perverse effects on the wages of employed women and mothers in particular. Yet few have addressed the causal impact of such policies and the mechanisms they might trigger at the individual level to produce such wage responses. We assess if and how two decades of reforms of parental leave schemes in Germany have shaped changes in the motherhood wage penalty over time. We compare two sweeps of reforms inspired by opposite principles, one allowing for longer periods out of paid work, the other prompting quicker re-entry in the labour market. We deploy panel data (G-SOEP 1985-2014) and a within-person difference-in-differences design. Motherhood wage penalties were found to be harsher than previously assessed in the 1990s. As parental leave reform triggered longer time spent on leave coupled with better tenure accumulation, wage losses for mothers remained stable in this first period. Conversely, we can no longer detect motherhood wage penalties for women affected by the later reform. Shorter career breaks and increased work hours may have benefited new mothers in the late 2000s, leading to a substantial improvement in their wage prospects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While leaves of absence might have a short-term negative impact on career progression, they are expected to have a positive effect on women's employment in the long run by maintaining attachment to the labour market and employer-employee matches (Mari and Cutuli, 2018).”
From Women’s employment and fertility in Korea: A literature review (2024) · cites this paper as Mari and Cutuli, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable
Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455 · Cited by 1,168
The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe
Ruhm, C. J. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555586 · Cited by 858
Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.0.0056 · Cited by 588
Revisiting Event Study Designs
Borusyak, K., & Jaravel, X. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2826228 · Cited by 463
Cited by
Brini, E. (2020) · Genus · doi:10.1186/s41118-020-00074-7 · Cited by 34
Women’s employment and fertility in Korea: A literature review
(2024) · OECD Economics Department Working Papers · doi:10.1787/ac53879e-en · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Mari, G., & Cutuli, G.
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2018-12-14
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 4
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do parental leaves make the motherhood wage penalty worse? Assessing two decades of German reforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31235/osf.io/f2nrc
- The paper
- Mari, G., & Cutuli, G. (2018). Do parental leaves make the motherhood wage penalty worse? Assessing two decades of German reforms. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f2nrc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.