The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stability of Not-In-My-Backyard Attitudes toward Refugees: Evidence from the Ukrainian Refugee Crisis
Open accessAbstract
To what extent has the Ukrainian refugee crisis altered citizens' attitudes toward refugee resettlement? Leveraging data from original repeated surveys of citizens in the ten countries with the largest refugee resettlement programs, we examine changes in public opinion before and after the crisis. Our findings reveal a substantial increase in support for refugee resettlement during the crisis as compared to the pre-crisis period. Nevertheless, we find that collective action problems surrounding refugee resettlement programs are likely to persist. In all ten countries, citizens who support resettlement in a general sense are significantly less supportive of resettlement within their own country or local community. We further show that these "not-in-my-backyard" (NIMBY) attitudes toward refugees are nearly universal, and are consistent across countries as well as subgroups of individuals with varying ideologies, perceptions of refugees, and socio-demographic backgrounds. These results suggest that it may prove difficult to achieve global coordination on refugee resettlement policy, even in times of heightened public support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across ten European countries, support for refugee resettlement significantly increased during the crisis compared to the pre-crisis period.
“Clayton, Ferwerda, and Horiuchi 2022, through repeated measurements prior-and during the current conflict, showed a significant increase in support for refugee resettlement during the crisis compared to the pre-crisis period across ten European countries.”
From Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment: A Critical and Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Clayton, Ferwerda, and Horiuchi 2022
Citations
Cites
Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12081 · Cited by 951
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers
Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2147 · Cited by 811
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment: A Critical and Systematic Review
Mickelsson, T. B. (2025) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12502 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Clayton, K., Ferwerda, J., & Horiuchi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Horiuchi, Yusaku
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2022-06-02
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281747396
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Keywords
- attitudes toward refugees, refugee resettlement, Ukrainian refugee crisis, public opinion change, collective action problems, refugee resettlement policy, international policy coordination, perceptions of refugees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review