PreprintCited by 6Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration, Racism, and Human RightsMigration and Exile Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Stability of Not-In-My-Backyard Attitudes toward Refugees: Evidence from the Ukrainian Refugee Crisis

Open access
Clayton, Katherine, Ferwerda, Jeremy, Horiuchi, Yusaku·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

To what extent has the Ukrainian refugee crisis altered citizens' attitudes toward refugee resettlement? Leveraging data from original repeated surveys of citizens in the ten countries with the largest refugee resettlement programs, we examine changes in public opinion before and after the crisis. Our findings reveal a substantial increase in support for refugee resettlement during the crisis as compared to the pre-crisis period. Nevertheless, we find that collective action problems surrounding refugee resettlement programs are likely to persist. In all ten countries, citizens who support resettlement in a general sense are significantly less supportive of resettlement within their own country or local community. We further show that these "not-in-my-backyard" (NIMBY) attitudes toward refugees are nearly universal, and are consistent across countries as well as subgroups of individuals with varying ideologies, perceptions of refugees, and socio-demographic backgrounds. These results suggest that it may prove difficult to achieve global coordination on refugee resettlement policy, even in times of heightened public support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31235/osf.io/wn32u

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across ten European countries, support for refugee resettlement significantly increased during the crisis compared to the pre-crisis period.

    “Clayton, Ferwerda, and Horiuchi 2022, through repeated measurements prior-and during the current conflict, showed a significant increase in support for refugee resettlement during the crisis compared to the pre-crisis period across ten European countries.”

    From Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment: A Critical and Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Clayton, Ferwerda, and Horiuchi 2022

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clayton, K., Ferwerda, J., & Horiuchi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Horiuchi, Yusaku
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Published
2022-06-02
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281747396
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
attitudes toward refugees, refugee resettlement, Ukrainian refugee crisis, public opinion change, collective action problems, refugee resettlement policy, international policy coordination, perceptions of refugees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review