Cited by 27Political Economy and MarxismNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationMarxism and Critical Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding Accumulation: The Relevance of Marx’s Theory of Primitive Accumulation in Media and Communication Studies

Open access
Ekman, Mattias·2012·tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss and use Marx’s theory on primitive accumulation, outlined in the first volume of Capital, in relation to media and communication research. In order to develop Marx’s argument the discussion is revitalized through Harvey’s concept of accumulation by dispossession. The article focuses on two different fields within media and communication research where the concept of accumulation by dispossession is applicable. First, the role of news media content, news flows and news media systems are discussed in relation to social mobilization against capitalism, privatizations, and the financial sector. Second, Marx’s theory is used to examine how communication in Web 2.0 and the development of ICTs could advance the processes of capital accumulation by appropriating the work performed by users of Web 2.0 and by increasing the corporate surveillance of Internet users. In conclusion, by analyzing how primitive accumulation is intertwined with contemporary expanded reproduction of capital, the article shows that Marx’s theory can contribute to critical media and communication research in several ways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31269/triplec.v10i2.407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Almiron, Núria. 2010 Journalism in Crisis. Corporate Media and Financialization. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  2. Bennett, W. L. Pickard, V. Iozzi, D. Schroeder, C. Lagos, T. and Caswell, E. 2004. Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication 54: 437-455.
  3. Callinicos, Alex. 2009. Imperialism and Global Political Economy. London: Polity Press.
  4. Carter, Cynthia. and Weaver, C. K. 2003. Violence and the Media. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  5. Cottle, Simon. 2006. Mediatized conflict: developments in media and conflict studies. New York: Open University Press. Dalarnas Tidningar. 2010. Så mycket har Teliaaktien fallit. Dalarnas Tidningar 14 June 2010. Accessed 25 February 2012. http://www.dt.se/nyheter/dalarna/1.3086140-sa-mycket-har-teliaaktien-fallit
  6. Doyle, Aaron. 2003. Arresting Images: Crime and Policing in Front of the Television Camera. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
  7. Fairclough, Norman. 2006. Language and Globalization. New York: Routledge.
  8. Fraser, Matthew. 2009. Five reasons for crash blindness. British Journalism Review 20(4): 78-83.
  9. Fuchs, Christian. 2009. Some reflections on Manuel Castells' book Communication Power. tripleC -Cognition, Communica- tion, Co-operation: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 7(1): 94-108. Accessed 27 Feb- ruary 2012. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/136/90
  10. Fuchs, Christian. 2011. Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies. New York: Routledge.
  11. Galtung, Johan. 1990. Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research. 27(3): 291-305.
  12. Halloran, James. D. Elliot, Philip. and Murdock, Graham.1970. Demonstrations and Communication: A Case Study. Har- mondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
  13. Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Hope, Wayne. 2010. Time Communication, and Financial Collapse. International Journal of Communication 4 2010: 649- 669.
  16. Jhally, Sut. 2000. Advertising at the edge of the apocalypse. In Critical studies in media commercialism. Edited by R. An- dersen and L. Strate. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Klein, Naomi. 2001. Reclaiming The Commons. New Left Review nr.9
  18. Luxemburg, Rosa. 1913, 2003. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Routledge Classics.
  19. Magnusson, Karl. Erik. 2000. Telia spås en bra start. Experterna råder till köp av den nya folkaktien. Göteborgs-Posten, May 22. 35. Marx, Karl. 1857,1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. London: Penguin Classics.
  20. Marx, Karl. 1867,1990. Capital: Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Classics.
  21. Marx, Karl. 1885,1992. Capital: Volume 2: A Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Classics.
  22. McChesney, Robert. W. 2007. Communication Revolution. London: The New Press.
  23. Meidner, Rudolf. 1993. Why did the Swedish Model Fail? Socialist Register Vol. 29: 211-228.
  24. Mosco, Vincent. 2009. The Political Economy of Communication. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.
  25. Murdock, Graham. 1981. Political Deviance: the press presentation of a militant mass demonstration. In The Manufacture of News: social problems, deviance and the mass media. Edited by Cohen, S. and Young, J. London: Constable.
  26. Olivera, Oscar, and Lewis, Tom. 2004. Cochabamba! Water Rebellion in Bolivia. Boston: South End Press.
  27. Schechter, Danny. 2009. Credit crisis: How did we miss it? British Journalism Review 20(1): 19-26.
  28. Sen, Jai, and Waterman, Peter. (eds.) 2009 World Social Forum Challenging Empires. Montreal/New York/London: Black Rose Books.
  29. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2003 Speaking Out Against the Incitement to Silence: The Brittish Press and the 2001 May Day Protests. In Representing Resistance-Media, Civil Disobedience and The Global Justice Movment. Edited by Opel, A. and Pompper, D. Westport/CT: Praeger Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ekman, M.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ekman, Mattias
Venue
tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
156-170
ISSN
1726-670X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1565659173
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
Keywords
primitive accumulation, Marx's Capital, accumulation by dispossession, David Harvey, capital accumulation, news media, social mobilization, privatization, financialization, Web 2.0, information and communication technologies, corporate surveillance, expanded reproduction of capital, critical media studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review