Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field and laboratory procedures used in a soil chronosequence study

Open access
·1986

Abstract

FIGURES 1. Step-by-step procedures used to analyze soil samples 2 2. Profiles of Pleistocene terraces developed along the Cowlitz River upstream of Toledo, Washington 4 3. Example of a soil-description sheet used in the project 5 4. Correlation and regression analysis of field pH to lab pH 7 5. Percent <2m clay versus depth for horizon samples (solid line) and subsamples (dashed line) for two Merced samples 8 6. View of a sample in proper position over the cup horn 10 7. Construction of a Whittig-type wash bottle 13 8. Example of a temperature-time diagram used in particle-size analysis 14 9. Diagram of effects of dithionite pretreatment on particle-size distribution 15 10. Regression and correlation of saturation pH with 1:1 water pH 21 11. Regression and correlation of 1:1 KC1 pH with 1:1 water pH 21 12. Chittick apparatus and accessory equipment 31 13. Replicate analyses of CaCO3 content on calcareous soil samples and reagentgrade CaCO3 (100.01 percent) 33 14. Flow chart of dry-combustion train 34 III 15. Correlation and regression of Walkley-Black and dry-combustion carbon 36 16. Nitrogen distillation apparatus 37 17. Percent Fe extracted by citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite (CBD) for ground versus unground samples 41 TABLES 1. Comparison of cup horn ultrasonic soil dispersion with Calgon soil dispersion for soils from the Honcut Creek chronosequence 11 2. Sand and silt destruction during ultrasonic treatment 11 3. Settling times for 2-, 5-, and 20-m particles to pass through 10 cm of water 15 4. Repeat determinations of particle size for sample splitter vs. hand sampling 16 5. Effects of citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite pretreatment on particle-size distribution 16 6. Reproducibility of particle-size analysis by the pipette method 17 7. Example of reproducibility of bulk-density measurements of triplicate samples by the paraffin clod procedure 20 8. Reproducibility of soil pH measurements by three methods 21 9. Example of reproducibility and comparison of methods for cation exchange capacity (meq/100 g soil) 24 10. The effect of BaC12-triethanolamine in the measurement of CEC, extractable cations, and extractable acidity of various soils 24 11. Initial dilution recommendations for soil solution analyses by atomic absorption spectrophotometry 25 12. Initial concentration recommendations for atomic absorption spectrophotometry standard solutions 25 13. Preparation of standard solutions for atomic absorption spectrophotometry 25 14. Theoretical conductivity of 0.01 N KCl solution at varying temperatures 28 15. Factors for converting sample solution conductivity measured at varying temperatures to the standard 25 C 28 16. Example of reproducibility of total carbon analyses by dry combustion 35 17. Example of reproducibility of organic carbon analyses by the Walkley-Black procedure 36 18. CBD iron and aluminum extraction tests using two soil samples from the Santa Cruz chronosequence 39 19. Effect of organic matter removal upon the amount of iron determined 40 20. Example of magnetics removed from several soils by the proposed method 43 21. Step-by-step procedure for phosphorus fractionation 44

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/b1648

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Published
1986
OpenAlex
W87430995
Cited by
218
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field and laboratory procedures used in a soil chronosequence study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/b1648
The paper
Field and laboratory procedures used in a soil chronosequence study. (1986). https://doi.org/10.3133/b1648

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.