The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001
Open accessAbstract
For additional information, contact: National Water-Quality Assessment ProgramU.S. Geological Survey413 National Center12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, Virginia 20192https://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ This report is one of a series of publications, The Quality of Our Nation's Waters, that describe major findings of the NAWQA Program on water-quality issues of regional and national concern. This report presents evaluations of pesticides in streams and ground water based on findings for the first decadal cycle of NAWQA. 'Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992-2001' greatly expands the analysis of pesticides presented in 'Nutrients and Pesticides,' which was the first report in the series and was based on early results from 1992 to 1995. Other reports in this series cover additional water-quality constituents of concern, such as volatile organic compounds and trace elements, as well as physical and chemical effects on aquatic ecosystems. Each report builds toward a more comprehensive understanding of regional and national water resources. The information in this series is intended primarily for those interested or involved in resource management, conservation, regulation, and policymaking at regional and national levels. In addition, the information might interest those at a local level who wish to know more about the general quality of streams and ground water in areas near where they live and how that quality compares with other areas across the Nation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pesticides in Drinking Water—A Review
Syafrudin, M., Kristanti, R. A., Yuniarto, A., Hadibarata, T., Rhee, J., Al-onazi, W. A., Algarni, T. S., Almarri, A. H., & Al-Mohaimeed, A. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020468 · Cited by 732
Understanding of the impact of chemicals on amphibians: a meta‐analytic review
Egea‐Serrano, A., Relyea, R. A., Tejedo, M., & Torralva, M. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.249 · Cited by 279
Insecticides: Impact on the Environment and Human Health
Ansari, M. S., Moraiet, M. A., & Ahmad, S. (2014) · Environmental Deterioration and Human Health · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7890-0_6 · Cited by 152
Hoekman, S. K., Broch, A., & Liu, X. (. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.050 · Cited by 83
Nowell, L. H., Moran, P. W., Bexfield, L. M., Mahler, B. J., Van Metre, P. C., Bradley, P. M., Schmidt, T. S., Button, D. T., & Qi, S. L. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148453 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilliom, R. J., Barbash, J. E., Crawford, C. G., Hamilton, P. A., Martin, J. D., Nakagaki, N., Nowell, L. H., Scott, J. C., Stackelberg, P. E., Thelin, G. P., & Wolock, D. M.
- Venue
- Circular
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2006
- ISSN
- 1067-084X (ISSN-L)
- 2330-5703
- OpenAlex
- W1604206655
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/cir1291
- The paper
- Gilliom, R. J., Barbash, J. E., Crawford, C. G., Hamilton, P. A., Martin, J. D., Nakagaki, N., Nowell, L. H., Scott, J. C., Stackelberg, P. E., Thelin, G. P., & Wolock, D. M. (2006). Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001. Circular. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.