The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States
Abstract
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides information to the public and to policy-makers concerning the current use and flow of minerals and materials in the United States economy. The USGS collects, analyzes, and disseminates minerals information on most nonfuel mineral commodities.This USGS digital database is an online compilation of historical U.S. statistics on mineral and material commodities. The database contains information on approximately 90 mineral commodities, including production, imports, exports, and stocks; reported and apparent consumption; and unit value (the real and nominal price in U.S. dollars of a metric ton of apparent consumption). For many of the commodities, data are reported as far back as 1900. Each commodity file includes a document that describes the units of measure, defines terms, and lists USGS contacts for additional information.End-use tables complement these statistics by supplying, for most of these commodities, information about the distribution of apparent consumption.This publication draws on more than 125 years of minerals information experience. At the request of the 47th Congress of the United States (1882; 22 Stat. 329), the U.S. Government began the collection and public distribution of these types of data. The Federal agencies responsible for the collection of the data have changed through time. For the years 1882-1924, the USGS collected and published these data; the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) performed these tasks from 1925-95; and in 1996, the responsibilities once again passed to the USGS (following the closure of the USBM) (Mlynarski, 1998).The USGS collects data on a monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual basis from more than 18,000 minerals-related producer and consumer establishments that cooperate with the USGS. These companies voluntarily complete about 40,000 canvass forms that survey production, consumption, recycling, stocks, shipments, and other essential information. Data are also gathered from site visits, memberships on domestic and international minerals-related committees, and coordination with other government organizations and trade associations.The USGS makes this information available through published products, including monthly, quarterly, and annual Mineral Industry Surveys, the annual Minerals Yearbook (MYB), the annual Mineral Commodity Summaries (MCS), and special mineral commodity studies, including the history of metal prices and materials flow studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G., & Fu, X. (2017) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 · Cited by 1,572
Monteiro, P. J. M., Miller, S. A., & Horvath, A. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4930 · Cited by 1,454
Lithium availability and future production outlooks
Vikström, H., Davidsson, S., & Höök, M. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.005 · Cited by 926
Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices
Power, G., Gräfe, M., & Klauber, C. (2011) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.006 · Cited by 746
Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation
Xi, F., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Crawford-Brown, D., Guan, D., Pade, C., Shi, T., Syddall, M., Lv, J., Ji, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2840 · Cited by 689
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, T., Matos, G. R., Buckingham, D. A., DiFrancesco, C. A., Porter, K. E., Berry, C., Crane, M., Goonan, T., & Sznopek, J.
- Venue
- Data Series
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2005
- ISSN
- 2327-638X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1559823627
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/ds140
- The paper
- Kelly, T., Matos, G. R., Buckingham, D. A., DiFrancesco, C. A., Porter, K. E., Berry, C., Crane, M., Goonan, T., & Sznopek, J. (2005). Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States. Data Series. https://doi.org/10.3133/ds140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.