The DOI matches its Crossref record.
U.S. Geological Survey's alert notification system for volcanic activity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the USA, the USGS has the federal responsibility to issue timely and effective warnings of potential volcanic eruptions”
From Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present (2023) · cites this paper as Gardner and Guffanti 2006
In the citing paper
“Within this system, alert level terms such as Watch and Warning were already familiar to emergency managers due to their use by the National Weather Service (Gardner and Guffanti 2006).”
From Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present (2023) · cites this paper as Gardner and Guffanti 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present
Wright, H. M. N., Driedger, C. L., Pallister, J. S., Newhall, C. G., Clynne, M. A., & Ewert, J. W. (2023) · Bulletin of Volcanology · doi:10.1007/s00445-023-01663-y · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, C. A., & Guffanti, M. C.
- ORCID
- Gardner, Cynthia A.
- Venue
- Fact Sheet
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2006
- ISSN
- 2327-6932
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
