The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised Protocols for Sampling Algal, Invertebrate, and Fish Communities as Part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program
Open accessAbstract
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is committed to providing the Nation with accurate and timely scientific information that helps enhance and protect the overall quality of life and that facilitates effective management of water, biological, energy, and mineral resources.Information on the quality of the Nation's water resources is critical to assuring the longterm availability of water that is safe for drinking and recreation and suitable for industry, irrigation, and habitat for fish and wildlife.Population growth and increasing demands for multiple water uses make water availability, now measured in terms of quantity and quality, even more essential to the long-term sustainability of our communities and ecosystems.The USGS implemented the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program in 1991 to support national, regional, and local information needs and decisions related to water-quality management and policy.Shaped by and coordinated with ongoing efforts of other Federal, State, and local agencies, the NAWQA Program is designed to answer: What is the condition of our Nation's streams and ground water?How are the conditions changing over time?How do natural features and human activities affect the quality of streams and ground water, and where are those effects most pronounced?By combining information on water chemistry, physical characteristics, stream habitat, and aquatic life, the NAWQA Program aims to provide science-based insights for current and emerging water issues and priorities.NAWQA results can contribute to informed decisions that result in practical and effective water-resource management and strategies that protect and restore water quality.From 1991-2001, the NAWQA Program completed interdisciplinary assessments in 51 of the Nation's major river basins and aquifer systems, referred to as Study Units.Baseline conditions were established for comparison to future assessments, and long-term monitoring was initiated in every basin studied.Financial constraints will reduce the number of Study Units that NAWQA can assess in the future; therefore, during the next decade, 42 of the 51 Study Units will be reassessed so that 10 years of comparable monitoring data will be available to determine trends at many of the Nation's streams and aquifers.The next 10 years of study also will fill in critical gaps in characterizing water-quality conditions, enhance understanding of factors that affect water quality, and establish links between sources of contaminants, the transport of those contaminants through the hydrologic system, and the potential effects of contaminants on humans and aquatic ecosystems.The USGS aims to disseminate credible, timely, and relevant science information so that the most current knowledge about water resources can be applied in management and policy decisions.We hope this NAWQA publication will provide you with insights and information to meet your needs, and will foster increased citizen awareness and involvement in the protection and restoration of our Nation's waters.The USGS recognizes that a national assessment by a single program cannot address all water-resource issues of interest.External coordination at all levels is critical for a fully integrated understanding of watersheds and for cost-effective management, regulation, and conservation of our Nation's water resources.The NAWQA Program, therefore, depends on advice and information from other agencies-Federal, State, interstate, Tribal, and local-as well as nongovernment organizations, industry, academia, and other stakeholder groups.Your assistance and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-0333 · Cited by 2,648
Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters
Elliott, J. M., & Bagenal, T. B. (1979) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4121 · Cited by 2,104
Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters.
Lancaster, J., & Allan, J. D. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261644 · Cited by 372
Gilliom, R. J., Alley, W. M., & Gurtz, M. E. (1995) · Circular · doi:10.3133/cir1112 · Cited by 361
Methods for collection and analysis of aquatic biological and microbiological samples
Britton, L. J., & Greeson, P. E. (1988) · Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World · doi:10.3133/ofr88190 · Cited by 351
Ward, J. R., & Harr, C. A. (1990) · Open-File Report · doi:10.3133/ofr90140 · Cited by 188
Bayley, P. B., & Herendeen, R. A. (2000) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · Cited by 74
Cited by
Ecological Assessments with Algae: A Review and Synthesis
Stevenson, J. (2014) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12189 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulton, S. R., Kennen, J. G., Goldstein, R. M., & Hambrook, J. A.
- Venue
- Open-File Report
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2002
- ISSN
- 0196-1497 (ISSN-L)
- 2331-1258
- OpenAlex
- W115472308
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 7
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised Protocols for Sampling Algal, Invertebrate, and Fish Communities as Part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/ofr2002150
- The paper
- Moulton, S. R., Kennen, J. G., Goldstein, R. M., & Hambrook, J. A. (2002). Revised Protocols for Sampling Algal, Invertebrate, and Fish Communities as Part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Open-File Report. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr2002150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.