Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Irradiation of samples for 40Ar/39Ar dating using the Geological Survey TRIGA reactor

Open access
Dalrymple, G. Brent, Alexander, E.C., Lanphere, M.A., Kraker, G.P.·1981·Professional Paper

Abstract

The characteristics of the Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR) as a source of fast neutrons for the 40Ar/3 Ar technique of K-Ar dating have been determined using data from more then 45 irradiations in the central thimble (core) facility.The GSTR has a flux over the entire energy spectrum of 1.1 x 1017 n/cm2 -MWH and a fast/thermal ratio on the centerline of the central thimble of 117 for fast neutron energies greater than 0.6 MeV.Production of 39Ar is about?x 10~13 mole/gram-percent KgO MWH, and the cross section for the reaction 39K(n, p) 39Ar is 65 ± 4 millibarns for epithermal (> 0.6 MeV) neutrons.Most 4 Ar/ Ar dating applications require about 10-40 hours of irradiation in the GSTR at the maximum continuous power level of 1 MW.The peak neutron flux in the central thimble is 4 cm above the physical centerline, and the verticle flux gradient in the centermost 20 centimeters varies from a small fraction of a percent to a maximum of about 3.5 percent per centimeter.The effect of this gradient can be effectively cancelled by suitable sample encapsulation and the use of a sample holder designed for the purpose.The horizontal flux gradient is less than 0.5 percent over the width of the central thimble.Self-shielding in a solid core of diabase 2.40 cm in diameter and 2.54 cm high is approximately 3 percent from the outside to the center, but self-shielding is probably negligible for the smaller samples usually irradiated for K-Ar dating.Corrections for interfering Ar isotopes produced by neutron reactions with Ca are relatively reproducible with values of 2.64 ± 0.017 x 10~4 for ( 36Ar/ 37Ar) Ca and 6.73 ± 0.037 x 1Q~4 for ( 39Ar/37Ar) Ca.The measured values for ( 40Ar/ 39Ar)ic, however, vary by an order of magnitude.This variability, whose cause is unknown, has been reported from other reactors.The corrections for interfering Ar isotopes can be minimized by using optimization curves for the GSTR to choose the best sample size and irradiation time for a given material.Of more than 100 possible neutron reactions in common rocks and minerals, only 26 need be considered for purposes of radiological safety.The activity produced by these reactions upon irradiation of samples can be conveniently and accurately predicted either by a computer program or from graphs specifically devised for the GSTR. SAMPLE ENCAPSULATIONControl rod Transient rod drive _/-1 LazX.SUSa " cr-^> loading tube .'»»•;"°°;Aluniinuin tanker ';.°.^V.^'C!^°«°V.'o»°'»-/?>V05V%:BBi'''wced str"uc'tflral\≮re°tVVC"v»»V^ a ^o o °o A» O- 0 ?0 ?0 ?0 ?0 ?0 ?0 F Q ?0 ,.0 ?0 ?0 AR 37 -Ar DECAY CORRECTION PROGRAM

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/pp1176

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dalrymple, G. B., Alexander, E. C., Lanphere, M. A., & Kraker, G. P.
Venue
Professional Paper
Published
1981
ISSN
  • 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-7102
OpenAlex
W934267857
Cited by
523
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.